Suppr超能文献

预测希氏束起搏纠正左束支传导阻滞的心电图模式。

Electrocardiographic patterns predictive of left bundle branch block correction with His bundle pacing.

机构信息

Arrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain.

Hemodynamic Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;43(11):1318-1324. doi: 10.1111/pace.14021. Epub 2020 Aug 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Permanent His bundle pacing (p-HBP) could be an alternative for traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but an important limitation is that p-HBP cannot always correct the left bundle branch block (LBBB). The purpose of this article is to assess electrocardiographic patterns of LBBB that can predict electrocardiographic response (QRS narrowing) to His bundle pacing.

METHODS

We designed a prospective descriptive study of patients with LBBB and CRT indication proposed for CRT by p-HBP. We analyzed the correlation between the different electrocardiographic patterns and the correction of conduction disturbance (LBBB).

RESULTS

We included 70 patients. Pacing at the location where His bundle electrogram was recorded narrowed the QRS in 81.4% (n = 57). Basically, we identified two electrocardiographic patterns in lead V1: QS or rS. The QS pattern was a sensitivity of 56%, a specificity of 84.6%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.1% to predict the correction of the LBBB (area under the curve [AUC] = .70). In patients with rS pattern, a ratio between the descending and the ascending S wave component duration ≥0.64 was a very good predictor of the correction of the LBBB (AUC = .968); with a value ≥0.64, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV was 92%, 100%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LBBB and CRT indication, the QS pattern in lead V1 predicts the correction of the QRS with HBP. In the case of rS pattern in lead V1, the ratio descending/ascending S wave component duration has a strong correlation with the LBBB correction.

摘要

介绍

永久性希氏束起搏(p-HBP)可能是传统心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的替代方法,但一个重要的局限性是 p-HBP 不能总是纠正左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)。本文的目的是评估 LBBB 的心电图模式,这些模式可以预测希氏束起搏的心电图反应(QRS 变窄)。

方法

我们设计了一项前瞻性描述性研究,纳入了 LBBB 且 CRT 适应证拟行 p-HBP 起搏的患者。我们分析了不同心电图模式与传导障碍(LBBB)纠正之间的相关性。

结果

我们纳入了 70 例患者。在记录希氏束电图的部位起搏可使 81.4%(n=57)的 QRS 变窄。基本上,我们在 V1 导联识别出两种心电图模式:QS 或 rS。QS 模式的敏感性为 56%,特异性为 84.6%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 94.1%,可预测 LBBB 的纠正(曲线下面积[AUC]为.70)。在 rS 模式的患者中,下/上 S 波成分持续时间比值≥0.64 是 LBBB 纠正的极好预测指标(AUC =.968);比值≥0.64 时,敏感性、特异性和 PPV 分别为 92%、100%和 100%。

结论

在 LBBB 且 CRT 适应证的患者中,V1 导联的 QS 模式可预测 HBP 对 QRS 的纠正。在 V1 导联出现 rS 模式的情况下,下/上 S 波成分持续时间比值与 LBBB 纠正具有很强的相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验