• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程皮肤病学单位与西班牙南部医院常规监测相比的经济影响和成本节约。

Economic impact and cost savings of teledermatology units compared to conventional monitoring at hospitals in southern Spain.

机构信息

Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Hospital de Poniente, Spain.

Management Unit, Hospital de Poniente, Spain.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Jul;28(6):436-444. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20942044. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1177/1357633X20942044
PMID:32722989
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Asynchronous teledermatology (TD) has undergone exponential growth in the past decade, allowing better diagnosis. Moreover, it saves both cost and time and reduces the number of visits involving travel and opportunity cost of time spent on visits to the hospital. The present study performed a cost-saving analysis of TD units and assessed whether they offered a cheaper alternative to conventional monitoring (CM) in hospitals from the perspective of public health-care systems (PHS) and patients.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective assessment of 7030 patients. A cost-saving analysis comparing TD units to CM for patients at the Hospital de Poniente was performed over a period of one year. The TD network covered the Hospital de Poniente reference area (Spain) linked to 37 primary care (PC) centres that belonged to the Poniente Health District of Almeria.

RESULTS

We observed a significant cost saving for TD units compared to participants in the conventional follow-up group. From the perspective of a PHS, there was a cost saving of 31.68% in the TD group (€18.59 TD vs. €27.20 CM) during the follow-up period. The number of CM visits to the hospital reduced by 38.14%. From the patients' perspective, the costs were lower, and the cost saving was 73.53% (€5.45 TD vs. €20.58 CM).

DISCUSSION

The cost-saving analysis showed that the TD units appeared to be significantly cheaper compared to CM.

摘要

简介

在过去十年中,异步远程皮肤病学(TD)呈指数级增长,从而能够更好地进行诊断。此外,它还节省了成本和时间,减少了因旅行而需要就诊的次数,以及患者在医院就诊时所花费的机会成本。本研究从公共医疗保健系统(PHS)和患者的角度对 TD 单位进行了成本节约分析,并评估了它们是否为医院常规监测(CM)提供了更经济的替代方案。

方法

这是一项对 7030 名患者的回顾性评估。对 Poniente 医院的患者进行了为期一年的 TD 单位与 CM 的成本节约分析。TD 网络覆盖了 Poniente 医院参考区域(西班牙),与 37 个初级保健(PC)中心相连,这些中心属于 Almeria 的 Poniente 卫生区。

结果

与常规随访组的参与者相比,我们观察到 TD 单位具有显著的成本节约。从 PHS 的角度来看,TD 组在随访期间节省了 31.68%的费用(TD 为 18.59 欧元,CM 为 27.20 欧元)。到医院进行 CM 就诊的次数减少了 38.14%。从患者的角度来看,成本更低,节省了 73.53%(TD 为 5.45 欧元,CM 为 20.58 欧元)。

讨论

成本节约分析表明,与 CM 相比,TD 单位似乎明显更便宜。

相似文献

1
Economic impact and cost savings of teledermatology units compared to conventional monitoring at hospitals in southern Spain.远程皮肤病学单位与西班牙南部医院常规监测相比的经济影响和成本节约。
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Jul;28(6):436-444. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20942044. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
2
Cost-Utility Analysis of Teledermatology Units in Primary Care Centers Versus Face-to-Face Dermatology Consultations in the Hospital.基层医疗中心远程皮肤病诊疗单元与医院面对面皮肤科会诊的成本-效用分析
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;42(1):419-434. doi: 10.1111/phn.13438. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study.远程监测老年起搏器患者的长期成本-效用分析:PONIENTE 研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01883-3.
4
Patients' out-of-pocket expenses analysis of presurgical teledermatology.术前远程皮肤病学患者自付费用分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Aug 23;17:18. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0186-3. eCollection 2019.
5
A cost savings analysis of asynchronous teledermatology compared to face-to-face dermatology in Catalonia.加泰罗尼亚地区异步远程皮肤病学与面对面皮肤病学的成本节约分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3464-4.
6
Cost analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system in Philadelphia.费城存储转发远程皮肤病学咨询系统的成本分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Sep;81(3):758-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
Cost-utility analysis on telemonitoring of users with pacemakers: The PONIENTE study.基于远程监测起搏器使用者的成本效用分析:PONIENTE 研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 May;25(4):204-212. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18767184. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
Cost-minimization analysis of teledermatology versus conventional care in the Brazilian National Health System.巴西国家卫生系统中远程皮肤病学与常规护理的成本最小化分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Oct;10(15):1159-1168. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0124. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
9
A Cost-Minimization Analysis of a Medical Record-based, Store and Forward and Provider-to-provider Telemedicine Compared to Usual Care in Catalonia: More Agile and Efficient, Especially for Users.基于医疗记录的存储转发和医患间远程医疗与常规护理的成本最小化分析:在加泰罗尼亚,这种模式更加灵活高效,尤其对用户而言。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 18;17(6):2008. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062008.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The German version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (GER-MAUQ): Translation and validation study in patients with cardiovascular disease.移动健康应用程序可用性问卷德文版(GER-MAUQ):心血管疾病患者的翻译与验证研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 31;10:20552076231225168. doi: 10.1177/20552076231225168. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
The Value of Anticoagulation Management Combining Telemedicine and Self-Testing in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.远程医疗与自我检测相结合的心血管疾病抗凝管理的价值:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Mar 14;19:279-290. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S395578. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparative Analysis of Quality of Life of Patients with Dermatological Problems: Teledermatology Versus Face-to-Face Dermatology.
皮肤病问题患者生活质量的比较分析:远程皮肤病学与面对面皮肤病学
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 30;10(11):2172. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112172.
4
Teledermatology versus Face-to-Face Dermatology: An Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness from Eight Studies from Europe and the United States.远程皮肤病学与面对面皮肤病学:来自欧洲和美国的八项研究的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(5):2534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052534.