Department of Sport, Food and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Campus Sogndal, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences , Sogndal, Norway.
Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, PROFITH "Promoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (Imuds), University of Granada , Granada, Spain.
J Sports Sci. 2020 Dec;38(23):2708-2719. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1796462. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
It is discussed whether associations between accelerometer-derived physical activity intensities and outcomes should be analysed as absolute or relative data. The aim of the present study was to compare interpretation of association patterns of spectrum physical activity descriptions with outcome using raw, normalized, log-transformed, or compositional data. We used two datasets including 1) 841 schoolchildren and a cardiometabolic health outcome and 2) 1081 preschool children and a locomotor skill outcome. Accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X+) data were described using multiple variables across the intensity spectrum. We varied the binning of variables to examine sensitivity of the compositional analyses to changes in the distribution centre. We used multivariate pattern analysis for all analyses and interpretations of data. Analyses of absolute (i.e., non-compositional) data showed weak associations for lower intensities and strongest associations with cardiometabolic health and locomotor skills for vigorous intensities. The same association patterns were partly observed for the compositional data, but association patterns were in some cases conflicting. The binning of variables had a major influence on associations for compositional data, but not for absolute data, meaning that conclusions depend on the operationalization of compositional data. These differences challenge and confuse interpretation of association patterns derived from the different approaches.
正在讨论加速度计得出的体力活动强度与结果之间的关联是否应作为绝对或相对数据进行分析。本研究的目的是比较使用原始、归一化、对数转换或组合数据来分析与结果相关的光谱体力活动描述的关联模式。我们使用了两个数据集,包括 1)841 名学童和一个心血管代谢健康结果,以及 2)1081 名学龄前儿童和一个运动技能结果。使用跨强度范围的多个变量来描述加速度计(ActiGraph GT3X+)数据。我们改变了变量的分组,以检查组合分析对分布中心变化的敏感性。我们使用多元模式分析对所有数据分析和解释。对绝对(即非组合)数据的分析表明,低强度的相关性较弱,而与心血管代谢健康和运动技能的相关性最强的是剧烈强度。组合数据也部分观察到了相同的关联模式,但在某些情况下关联模式相互矛盾。变量的分组对组合数据的关联有重大影响,但对绝对数据没有影响,这意味着结论取决于组合数据的操作化。这些差异挑战并混淆了从不同方法得出的关联模式的解释。