Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Thorax Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;97(4):E495-E501. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29151. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using three dimensional-quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) based fractional flow reserve (FFR) (vessel fractional flow reserve [vFFR], CAAS8.1, Pie Medical Imaging) and to correlate vFFR values with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the evaluation of intermediate left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis.
3D-QCA derived FFR indices have been recently developed for less invasive functional lesion assessment. However, LMCA lesions were vastly under-represented in first validation studies.
This observational single-center cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with stable angina, unstable angina, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonostial, intermediate grade LMCA stenoses who underwent IVUS evaluation. vFFR was computed based on two angiograms with optimal LMCA stenosis projection and correlated with IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA).
A total of 256 patients with intermediate grade LMCA stenosis evaluated with IVUS were screened for eligibility; 147 patients met the clinical inclusion criteria and had a complete IVUS LMCA footage available, of them, 63 patients (63 lesions) underwent 3D-QCA and vFFR analyses. The main reason for screening failure was insufficient quality of the angiogram (51 patients,60.7%). Mean age was 65 ± 11 years, 75% were male. Overall, mean MLA within LMCA was 8.77 ± 3.17 mm , while mean vFFR was 0.87 ± 0.09. A correlation was observed between vFFR and LMCA MLA (r = .792, p = .001). The diagnostic accuracy of vFFR ≤0.8 in identifying lesions with MLA < 6.0 mm (sensitivity 98%, specificity 71.4%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.00, p = .001) was good.
In patients with good quality angiographic visualization of LMCA and available complete LMCA IVUS footage, 3D-QCA based vFFR assessment of LMCA disease correlates well to LMCA MLA as assessed by IVUS.
我们旨在评估使用三维定量冠状动脉造影(3D-QCA)计算的血流储备分数(FFR)(血管 FFR [vFFR]、CAAS8.1、Pie Medical Imaging)评估中间左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)狭窄的可行性,并将 vFFR 值与血管内超声(IVUS)进行相关性分析。
3D-QCA 衍生的 FFR 指数最近已被用于更具侵袭性的功能病变评估。然而,在最初的验证研究中,LMCA 病变的代表性严重不足。
这项观察性单中心队列研究纳入了连续因稳定型心绞痛、不稳定型心绞痛或非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死以及非开口、中间级别的 LMCA 狭窄而接受 IVUS 评估的患者。基于两个具有最佳 LMCA 狭窄投影的血管造影图像计算 vFFR,并与 IVUS 测量的最小管腔面积(MLA)进行相关性分析。
共对 256 例经 IVUS 评估的中间级别的 LMCA 狭窄患者进行了筛选,其中 147 例符合临床纳入标准且具有完整的 IVUS-LMCA 图像,其中 63 例(63 个病变)进行了 3D-QCA 和 vFFR 分析。筛选失败的主要原因是血管造影质量不足(51 例,60.7%)。患者的平均年龄为 65±11 岁,75%为男性。总的来说,LMCA 内的平均 MLA 为 8.77±3.17mm,而平均 vFFR 为 0.87±0.09。vFFR 与 LMCA MLA 之间存在相关性(r=0.792,p=0.001)。vFFR≤0.8 对识别 MLA<6.0mm 的病变具有良好的诊断准确性(敏感度 98%,特异性 71.4%,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.95,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.89-1.00,p=0.001)。
在 LMCA 血管造影可视化质量良好且具有完整的 LMCA-IVUS 图像的患者中,基于 3D-QCA 的 vFFR 评估与 IVUS 评估的 LMCA-MLA 相关性良好。