Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 15;21(4):900-905. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46018.
Healthcare systems often expose patients to significant, preventable harm causing an estimated 44,000 to 98,000 deaths or more annually. This has propelled patient safety to the forefront, with reporting systems allowing for the review of local events to determine their root causes. As residents engage in a substantial amount of patient care in academic emergency departments, it is critical to use these safety event reports for resident-focused interventions and educational initiatives. This study analyzes reports from the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System to understand how the reports are categorized and how it relates to opportunities for resident education.
Identifying categories from the literature, three subject matter experts (attending physician, nursing director, registered nurse) categorized an initial 20 reports to resolve category gaps and then 100 reports to determine inter-rater reliability. Given sufficient agreement, the remaining 400 reports were coded individually for type of event and education among other categories.
After reviewing 513 events, we found that the most common event types were issues related to staff and resident training (25%) and communication (18%), with 31% requiring no education, 46% requiring directed educational feedback to an individual or group, 20% requiring education through monthly safety updates or meetings, 3% requiring urgent communication by email or in-person, and <1% requiring simulation.
Twenty years after the publication of To Err is Human, gains have been made integrating quality assurance and patient safety within medical education and hospital systems, but there remains extensive work to be done. Through a review and analysis of our patient safety event reporting system, we were able to gain a better understanding of the events that are submitted, including the types of events and their severity, and how these relate to the types of educational interventions provided (eg, feedback, simulation). We also determined that these events can help inform resident education and learning using various types of education. Additionally, incorporating residents in the review process, such as through root cause analyses, can provide residents with high-quality, engaging learning opportunities and useful, lifelong skills, which is invaluable to our learners and future physicians.
医疗保健系统经常使患者面临严重的、可预防的伤害,导致每年估计有 44000 至 98000 人死亡或更多。这使得患者安全成为当务之急,报告系统允许审查当地事件以确定其根本原因。由于住院医师在学术急诊科中进行大量患者护理,因此必须使用这些安全事件报告进行以住院医师为重点的干预和教育计划。本研究分析了弗吉尼亚联邦大学卫生系统的报告,以了解报告是如何分类的,以及它与住院医师教育机会的关系。
从文献中确定类别,三位主题专家(主治医生、护理主任、注册护士)对最初的 20 份报告进行分类,以解决类别差距,然后对 100 份报告进行分类,以确定组内可靠性。如果达成足够的一致意见,则对其余 400 份报告进行单独分类,以确定事件类型和其他类别中的教育类型。
在审查了 513 项事件后,我们发现最常见的事件类型是与员工和住院医师培训(25%)和沟通(18%)相关的问题,其中 31%不需要教育,46%需要针对个人或小组提供定向教育反馈,20%需要通过每月安全更新或会议进行教育,3%需要通过电子邮件或面对面的方式进行紧急沟通,<1%需要模拟。
在《犯错是人》出版 20 年后,在将质量保证和患者安全纳入医学教育和医院系统方面已经取得了进展,但仍有大量工作要做。通过对我们的患者安全事件报告系统的审查和分析,我们能够更好地了解提交的事件,包括事件类型和严重程度,以及这些事件与提供的教育干预类型(例如,反馈、模拟)之间的关系。我们还确定,这些事件可以通过使用各种类型的教育来帮助告知住院医师教育和学习。此外,通过根本原因分析等方式让住院医师参与审查过程,可以为住院医师提供高质量、引人入胜的学习机会和有用的终身技能,这对我们的学习者和未来医生来说是非常宝贵的。