• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Safety Event Reporting and Opportunities for Emergency Medicine Resident Education.患者安全事件报告与急诊住院医师教育机会。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 15;21(4):900-905. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46018.
2
House Staff Participation in Patient Safety Reporting: Identification of Predominant Barriers and Implementation of a Pilot Program.住院医师参与患者安全报告:主要障碍的识别与试点项目的实施。
South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):395-400. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000486.
3
Emergency Manual Uses During Actual Critical Events and Changes in Safety Culture From the Perspective of Anesthesia Residents: A Pilot Study.从麻醉住院医师角度看实际危急事件中应急手册的使用及安全文化的变化:一项试点研究
Anesth Analg. 2016 Sep;123(3):641-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001445.
4
Multidisciplinary Simulation Activity Effectively Prepares Residents for Participation in Patient Safety Activities.多学科模拟活动有效提高住院医师参与患者安全活动的能力。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e232-e237. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Incident Reporting in Emergency Medicine: A Thematic Analysis of Events.急诊医学中的事件报告:事件的主题分析。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):e60-e63. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000399.
7
A Multifaceted Intervention to Increase Surgery Resident Engagement in Reporting Adverse Events.一项旨在提高外科住院医师报告不良事件参与度的多方面干预措施。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
8
Synchronous collection of multisource feedback evaluations does not increase inter-rater reliability.多源反馈评估的同步收集并不会提高评分者间信度。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18 Suppl 2:S65-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01162.x.
9
Changing conversations: teaching safety and quality in residency training.转变对话:住院医师培训中的安全与质量教学
Acad Med. 2008 Nov;83(11):1080-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31818927f8.
10
Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department.急诊科实时非关键事件汇报实践的特点。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):146-151. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31467. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
2
Learning from Taiwan patient-safety reporting system.借鉴台湾地区的患者安全报告制度。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Dec;81(12):834-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
3
The relationship between organizational leadership for safety and learning from patient safety events.组织安全领导力与从患者安全事件中学习之间的关系。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):607-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01102.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
4
Learning from preventable adverse events in health care organizations: development of a multilevel model of learning and propositions.从医疗保健机构中可预防的不良事件中学习:学习的多层次模型及命题的发展
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):330-40. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296790.39128.20.
5
Toward learning from patient safety reporting systems.致力于从患者安全报告系统中学习。
J Crit Care. 2006 Dec;21(4):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.07.001.
6
Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study.事件报告的态度与障碍:一项医院合作研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb;15(1):39-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012559.
7
Reporting of adverse events.不良事件报告。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 14;347(20):1633-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMNEJMhpr011493.

患者安全事件报告与急诊住院医师教育机会。

Patient Safety Event Reporting and Opportunities for Emergency Medicine Resident Education.

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.

Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 15;21(4):900-905. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46018.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46018
PMID:32726262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7390572/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare systems often expose patients to significant, preventable harm causing an estimated 44,000 to 98,000 deaths or more annually. This has propelled patient safety to the forefront, with reporting systems allowing for the review of local events to determine their root causes. As residents engage in a substantial amount of patient care in academic emergency departments, it is critical to use these safety event reports for resident-focused interventions and educational initiatives. This study analyzes reports from the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System to understand how the reports are categorized and how it relates to opportunities for resident education.

METHODS

Identifying categories from the literature, three subject matter experts (attending physician, nursing director, registered nurse) categorized an initial 20 reports to resolve category gaps and then 100 reports to determine inter-rater reliability. Given sufficient agreement, the remaining 400 reports were coded individually for type of event and education among other categories.

RESULTS

After reviewing 513 events, we found that the most common event types were issues related to staff and resident training (25%) and communication (18%), with 31% requiring no education, 46% requiring directed educational feedback to an individual or group, 20% requiring education through monthly safety updates or meetings, 3% requiring urgent communication by email or in-person, and <1% requiring simulation.

CONCLUSION

Twenty years after the publication of To Err is Human, gains have been made integrating quality assurance and patient safety within medical education and hospital systems, but there remains extensive work to be done. Through a review and analysis of our patient safety event reporting system, we were able to gain a better understanding of the events that are submitted, including the types of events and their severity, and how these relate to the types of educational interventions provided (eg, feedback, simulation). We also determined that these events can help inform resident education and learning using various types of education. Additionally, incorporating residents in the review process, such as through root cause analyses, can provide residents with high-quality, engaging learning opportunities and useful, lifelong skills, which is invaluable to our learners and future physicians.

摘要

简介

医疗保健系统经常使患者面临严重的、可预防的伤害,导致每年估计有 44000 至 98000 人死亡或更多。这使得患者安全成为当务之急,报告系统允许审查当地事件以确定其根本原因。由于住院医师在学术急诊科中进行大量患者护理,因此必须使用这些安全事件报告进行以住院医师为重点的干预和教育计划。本研究分析了弗吉尼亚联邦大学卫生系统的报告,以了解报告是如何分类的,以及它与住院医师教育机会的关系。

方法

从文献中确定类别,三位主题专家(主治医生、护理主任、注册护士)对最初的 20 份报告进行分类,以解决类别差距,然后对 100 份报告进行分类,以确定组内可靠性。如果达成足够的一致意见,则对其余 400 份报告进行单独分类,以确定事件类型和其他类别中的教育类型。

结果

在审查了 513 项事件后,我们发现最常见的事件类型是与员工和住院医师培训(25%)和沟通(18%)相关的问题,其中 31%不需要教育,46%需要针对个人或小组提供定向教育反馈,20%需要通过每月安全更新或会议进行教育,3%需要通过电子邮件或面对面的方式进行紧急沟通,<1%需要模拟。

结论

在《犯错是人》出版 20 年后,在将质量保证和患者安全纳入医学教育和医院系统方面已经取得了进展,但仍有大量工作要做。通过对我们的患者安全事件报告系统的审查和分析,我们能够更好地了解提交的事件,包括事件类型和严重程度,以及这些事件与提供的教育干预类型(例如,反馈、模拟)之间的关系。我们还确定,这些事件可以通过使用各种类型的教育来帮助告知住院医师教育和学习。此外,通过根本原因分析等方式让住院医师参与审查过程,可以为住院医师提供高质量、引人入胜的学习机会和有用的终身技能,这对我们的学习者和未来医生来说是非常宝贵的。