Suppr超能文献

通过16S元条形码技术比较环境和培养来源的细菌群落:评估培养基选择性和检测稀有分类群的有力工具。

Comparison of Environmental and Culture-Derived Bacterial Communities through 16S Metabarcoding: A Powerful Tool to Assess Media Selectivity and Detect Rare Taxa.

作者信息

Pédron Jacques, Guyon Léa, Lecomte Amandine, Blottière Lydie, Chandeysson Charlotte, Rochelle-Newall Emma, Raynaud Xavier, Berge Odile, Barny Marie-Anne

机构信息

INRAE, IRD, Institut of Ecology and Environmental Sciences-Paris, Sorbonne Université, IEES-Paris, F-75231 Paris, France.

INRAE, Pathologie Végétale, F-84143 Montfavet, France.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2020 Jul 27;8(8):1129. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081129.

Abstract

To compare environmental and culture-derived microbial communities, we performed 16S metabarcoding of uncultured samples and their culture-derived bacterial lawns. Microbial communities were obtained from freshwater river samples representative of an anthropization gradient along a river stream. Their culture-derived bacterial lawns were obtained by growing aliquots of the samples on a broad range medium and on two different semi-selective media. The V3-V4 16S rRNA region was amplified and sequenced. The bacterial diversity of water samples decreased from the upper to lower stream sampling sites and, as expected, these differences were mostly suppressed by the culture step. Overall, the diversity of cultured-derived bacterial communities reflected selectivity of each tested medium. Comparison of treatments indicated that the culture selected both detected and rare undetected environmental species. Accurate detection of rare environmental bacteria of the genus by 16S metabarcoding of the culture lawn was demonstrated. Interestingly, for abundant taxa, such as those of the genus, the culture/environment ratio varied between sampled sites, indicating the difficulty of comparing cultured-derived taxa abundance between environmental sites. Finally, our study also highlighted media specificity and complementarity: bacterial communities grown on the two selective media, while selecting a small set of specific species, were mostly a subset of the bacterial community observed on the broad range medium.

摘要

为了比较环境来源和培养来源的微生物群落,我们对未培养样本及其培养来源的细菌菌苔进行了16S宏条形码分析。微生物群落取自沿河流具有人为影响梯度代表性的淡水河样本。它们的培养来源细菌菌苔是通过将样本的等分试样在广谱培养基和两种不同的半选择性培养基上培养获得的。对V3-V4 16S rRNA区域进行了扩增和测序。水样的细菌多样性从上游到下游采样点逐渐降低,正如预期的那样,这些差异在培养步骤中大多被抑制。总体而言,培养来源细菌群落的多样性反映了每种测试培养基的选择性。处理比较表明,培养过程既选择了已检测到的环境物种,也选择了罕见的未检测到的环境物种。通过对培养菌苔进行16S宏条形码分析,证明了对该属罕见环境细菌的准确检测。有趣的是,对于丰富的分类群,如该属的分类群,培养/环境比例在采样点之间有所不同,这表明比较不同环境地点培养来源分类群的丰度存在困难。最后,我们的研究还突出了培养基的特异性和互补性:在两种选择性培养基上生长的细菌群落,虽然选择了一小部分特定物种,但大多是在广谱培养基上观察到的细菌群落的一个子集。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验