Department of Neurobiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
California Nanosystems Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Aug 1;124(2):634-644. doi: 10.1152/jn.00316.2020. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
Survival relies on the ability to flexibly choose between different actions according to varying environmental circumstances. Many lines of evidence indicate that action selection involves signaling in corticostriatal circuits, including the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and dorsomedial striatum (DMS). While choice-specific responses have been found in individual neurons from both areas, it is unclear whether populations of OFC or DMS neurons are better at encoding an animal's choice. To address this, we trained head-fixed mice to perform an auditory guided two-alternative choice task, which required moving a joystick forward or backward. We then used silicon microprobes to simultaneously measure the spiking activity of OFC and DMS ensembles, allowing us to directly compare population dynamics between these areas within the same animals. Consistent with previous literature, both areas contained neurons that were selective for specific stimulus-action associations. However, analysis of concurrently recorded ensemble activity revealed that the animal's trial-by-trial behavior could be decoded more accurately from DMS dynamics. These results reveal substantial regional differences in encoding action selection, suggesting that DMS neural dynamics are more specialized than OFC at representing an animal's choice of action. While previous literature shows that both orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and dorsomedial striatum (DMS) represent information relevant to selecting specific actions, few studies have directly compared neural signals between these areas. Here we compared OFC and DMS dynamics in mice performing a two-alternative choice task. We found that the animal's choice could be decoded more accurately from DMS population activity. This work provides among the first evidence that OFC and DMS differentially represent information about an animal's selected action.
生存依赖于根据不断变化的环境情况灵活选择不同行动的能力。许多证据表明,动作选择涉及皮质纹状体回路中的信号传递,包括眶额皮层(OFC)和背内侧纹状体(DMS)。虽然已经在来自这两个区域的单个神经元中发现了与动作选择相关的特异性反应,但尚不清楚 OFC 或 DMS 神经元群体是否更擅长编码动物的选择。为了解决这个问题,我们训练头部固定的老鼠执行听觉引导的二选一选择任务,需要向前或向后移动操纵杆。然后,我们使用硅微探针同时测量 OFC 和 DMS 群体的尖峰活动,使我们能够在同一动物体内直接比较这些区域的群体动力学。与先前的文献一致,这两个区域都包含对特定刺激-动作关联具有选择性的神经元。然而,对同时记录的群体活动的分析表明,从 DMS 动力学可以更准确地解码动物的逐次试验行为。这些结果揭示了编码动作选择的显著区域差异,表明 DMS 神经动力学在代表动物的动作选择方面比 OFC 更专业化。虽然先前的文献表明眶额皮层(OFC)和背内侧纹状体(DMS)都代表了选择特定动作的相关信息,但很少有研究直接比较这些区域之间的神经信号。在这里,我们比较了执行二选一选择任务的老鼠的 OFC 和 DMS 动力学。我们发现,从 DMS 群体活动中可以更准确地解码动物的选择。这项工作首次提供了证据,表明 OFC 和 DMS 以不同的方式表示动物选择的动作信息。