Department of Adhesive Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University.
Dent Mater J. 2020 Dec 3;39(6):1022-1032. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-308. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
The effect of differences in the type of restoration and adhesive resin cement system on the bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic restoration after cyclic loading was examined quantitatively and qualitatively. Seventy-two human maxillary first molars were divided into three restoration groups: MOD-inlay, MODP-onlay, and crown. Immediate dentin sealing was applied to the exposed dentin of all prepared specimens. The 24 specimens of each restoration group were further divided into another three groups, and a different adhesive resin cement system was applied to each group for cementation. All restoratives were fabricated from feldspathic-ceramic-blocks and cemented with each adhesive resin cement system according to the manufacturer's instructions. The microtensile bond-strength was measured after cyclic loading and was not significantly affected by differences in the type of restoration or adhesive resin cement system. However, the type of restorations and adhesive resin cement systems did show significant differences in terms of the bonding reliability.
定量和定性地研究了修复体类型和粘接树脂水门汀系统的差异对循环载荷后 CAD/CAM 陶瓷修复体粘结的影响。将 72 个人上颌第一磨牙分为三组修复体:MOD-嵌体、MODP-高嵌体和全冠。所有预备标本的暴露牙本质均应用即刻牙本质封闭剂。每个修复组的 24 个标本进一步分为三组,每组应用不同的粘接树脂水门汀系统进行粘接。所有修复体均由长石陶瓷块制成,并按照制造商的说明用每种粘接树脂水门汀系统进行粘接。循环载荷后测量微拉伸粘结强度,修复体类型和粘接树脂水门汀系统之间没有显著差异。然而,修复体类型和粘接树脂水门汀系统在粘结可靠性方面确实存在显著差异。