Jinno Sadao, Onishi Akira, Dubreuil Maureen, Akashi Kengo, Hashimoto Motomu, Yamamoto Wataru, Murata Koichi, Takeuchi Tohru, Kotani Takuya, Maeda Yuichi, Ebina Kosuke, Son Yonsu, Amuro Hideki, Hara Ryota, Katayama Masaki, Saegusa Jun, Morinobu Akio
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-chou, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Dec;40(12):1987-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04660-y. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) between elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) and young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA) patients. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged ≧18 years enrolled in a Japanese multicenter observational registry between 2009 and 2018 who had moderate or high disease activity when initiating bDMARDs were included. EORA was defined as RA with onset at 60 or over. After propensity score weighting for differences in confounding factors, generalized estimating equations were used to assess the relationship between the age of RA onset and bDMARD clinical effectiveness at 48 weeks after starting a bDMARD. Among a total of 7183 patients in the registry, 2815 (39.2%) were identified as EORA. The proportion of patients on bDMARDs was lower in the EORA as compared to the YORA (18.3% vs 28.0%, p < 0.001). Of the 989 bDMARD initiators, 364 (36.8%) were identified as EORA. The median follow-up duration was 48 weeks both in the EORA and in the YORA. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics between the two age groups, there was no significant difference in Clinical Disease Activity Index scores at 48 weeks (mean difference 1.01, 95% CI = - 0.62 to 2.64, p = 0.22). There was a non-significant trend toward lower remission in EORA (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.24-1.14, p = 0.10), and low disease activity/remission was similar (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.29-2.52, p = 0.77). Drug retention (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.55-1.35, p = 0.78) and discontinuations due to adverse events (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38-1.18, p = 0.22) were similar between the two age groups after adjustment for confounders. In RA patients initiating bDMARDs, improvements in clinical disease at 48 weeks were similar between EORA and YORA. Drug retention and adverse events discontinuation were similar between the two age groups.
本研究的目的是比较老年起病类风湿关节炎(EORA)和青年起病类风湿关节炎(YORA)患者使用生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)的疗效和安全性。纳入2009年至2018年在日本多中心观察性登记处登记的年龄≧18岁、开始使用bDMARDs时疾病活动度为中度或高度的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者。EORA定义为发病年龄在60岁及以上的RA。在对混杂因素差异进行倾向评分加权后,使用广义估计方程评估RA发病年龄与开始使用bDMARDs后48周时bDMARD临床疗效之间的关系。在登记处总共7183例患者中,2815例(39.2%)被确定为EORA。与YORA相比,EORA中使用bDMARDs的患者比例较低(18.3%对28.0%,p<0.001)。在989例开始使用bDMARDs的患者中,364例(36.8%)被确定为EORA。EORA和YORA的中位随访时间均为48周。在调整两个年龄组之间的基线特征差异后,48周时临床疾病活动指数评分无显著差异(平均差异1.01,95%CI = -0.62至2.64,p = 0.22)。EORA中缓解率有降低的非显著趋势(OR = 0.52,95%CI = 0.24 - 1.14,p = 0.10),低疾病活动度/缓解情况相似(OR = 0.86,95%CI = 0.29 - 2.52,p = 0.77)。在调整混杂因素后,两个年龄组之间药物保留率(HR = 0.95,95%CI = 0.55 - 1.35,p = 0.78)和因不良事件停药率(HR = 0.78,95%CI = 0.38 - 1.18,p = 0.22)相似。在开始使用bDMARDs的RA患者中,EORA和YORA在48周时临床疾病改善情况相似。两个年龄组之间药物保留率和因不良事件停药情况相似。