Department of Psychology, Briar Cliff University, USA.
Department of Psychology, Marquette University, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Sep;114(2):193-202. doi: 10.1002/jeab.620. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
The current study analyzed the effects of three frames of reward magnitude-quantity, volume, and duration-on the rate at which college students discounted hypothetical, delayed monetary rewards. Hypothetical scenarios were presented using the fill-in-the-blank discounting questionnaire and participants made choices between immediate and delayed hypothetical monetary rewards. Scenarios framed the monetary choices as (a) quantity of dollar bills, (b) height (inches) of a stack of dollar bills, and (c) duration of time spent in a hypothetical cash machine to collect dollar bills. For each scenario, participants' subjective values were used to calculate the area under the curve (AuC). Framing resulted in a moderate effect size: The duration frame yielded significantly smaller AuC values compared to the quantity and volume frames. Thus, the framing of reward magnitude was a significant variable in controlling discounting rates for hypothetical, delayed monetary rewards. Subsequent investigations should be aware of the independent effects of the reward magnitude frames on delay discounting rates.
本研究分析了三种奖励幅度——数量、体积和时长——对大学生延迟货币奖励折扣率的影响。使用填空式折扣问卷呈现假设情景,参与者在即时和延迟假设货币奖励之间做出选择。情景将货币选择框定为(a) 美元钞票的数量,(b) 一叠美元钞票的高度(英寸),和(c) 在假设的取款机中花费的时间来收集美元钞票。对于每个情景,参与者的主观价值用于计算曲线下面积(AuC)。框架产生了中等大小的效应:与数量和体积框架相比,时长框架产生的 AuC 值显著更小。因此,奖励幅度的框架是控制假设延迟货币奖励折扣率的重要变量。后续研究应注意奖励幅度框架对延迟折扣率的独立影响。