Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):1056-1061. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1060.R3.
Current American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines for treating femoral fractures in children aged two to six years recommend early spica casting although some individuals have recommended intramedullary stabilization in this age group. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment and family burden of care of spica casting and flexible intramedullary nailing in this age group.
Patients aged two to six years old with acute, non-pathological femur fractures were prospectively enrolled at one of three tertiary children's hospitals. Either early closed reduction with spica cast application or flexible intramedullary nailing was accomplished under general anaesthesia. The treatment method was selected after discussion of the options by the surgeon with the family. Data were prospectively collected on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, complications, pain medication, and union. The Impact on Family Scale was obtained at the six-week follow-up visit. In all, 75 patients were included in the study: 39 in the spica group and 36 in the nailing group. The mean age of the spica group was 2.71 (2.0 to 6.9) years and the mean age of the nailing group was 3.16 (2.0 to 6.9) years.
All fractures healed without evidence of malunion or more than 2.0 cm of shortening. The mean Impact on Family score was 70.2 for the spica group and 63.2 (55 to 99) for the nailing group, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.024) in a univariate analysis suggesting less impairment of the family in the intramedullary nailing group. There was no significant difference between pain medication requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Two patients in the spica group and one patient in the intramedullary nailing group required additional treatment under anaesthesia.
Both early spica casting and intramedullary nailing were effective methods for treating femoral fractures in children two to six years of age. Intramedullary stabilization provides an option in this age group that may be advantageous in some social situations that depend on the child's mobility. Fracture treatment should be individualized based on factors that extend beyond anatomical and biological factors. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(8):1056-1061.
目前,美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)针对 2 至 6 岁儿童股骨干骨折的治疗指南建议早期使用皮肤牵引,但也有一些人建议在该年龄段使用髓内固定。本研究的目的是比较该年龄段皮肤牵引和弹性髓内钉治疗的效果和家庭护理负担。
前瞻性纳入三家三级儿童医院的 2 至 6 岁急性非病理性股骨干骨折患儿。在全身麻醉下,采用闭合复位联合皮肤牵引或弹性髓内钉固定。根据医生与患儿家庭讨论的结果,选择治疗方法。前瞻性收集患者人口统计学资料、骨折特征、并发症、镇痛药物使用及愈合情况。所有患者在 6 周随访时均采用家庭影响量表(Impact on Family Scale)进行评估。共纳入 75 例患儿,其中 39 例行皮肤牵引,36 例行髓内钉固定。皮肤牵引组患儿的平均年龄为 2.71 岁(2.0 至 6.9 岁),髓内钉固定组为 3.16 岁(2.0 至 6.9 岁)。
所有骨折均愈合,无畸形愈合或短缩超过 2.0 cm。皮肤牵引组的家庭影响量表评分平均为 70.2 分,髓内钉固定组为 63.2 分(55 至 99 分),单因素分析差异有统计学意义(p = 0.024),提示髓内钉固定组对家庭的影响较小。术后 24 小时内两组患儿的镇痛药物需求无显著差异。皮肤牵引组中有 2 例患儿和髓内钉固定组中有 1 例患儿需在全麻下进行额外治疗。
早期皮肤牵引和髓内钉固定均为治疗 2 至 6 岁儿童股骨干骨折的有效方法。在该年龄段,髓内固定是一种选择,在某些依赖患儿活动能力的社会情况下可能具有优势。骨折的治疗应根据超出解剖学和生物学因素的因素个体化。