• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Ovarian Cancer Risk: Results from the Multiethnic Cohort Study.种族/民族差异与卵巢癌风险:来自多民族队列研究的结果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Oct;29(10):2019-2025. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0569. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
2
Racial/ethnic differences in postmenopausal breast cancer risk by hormone receptor status: The multiethnic cohort study.按激素受体状态划分的绝经后乳腺癌风险的种族/民族差异:多民族队列研究。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;150(2):221-231. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33795. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Racial/ethnic differences in anthropometric and hormone-related factors and endometrial cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort Study.种族/民族差异在人体测量和激素相关因素与子宫内膜癌风险之间的关系:多民族队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2021 May;124(10):1724-1733. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01292-2. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies.卵巢癌流行病学中的种族/民族差异:12 项病例对照研究的汇总分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;47(2):460-472. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx252.
5
Racial/ethnic differences in endometrial cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study.子宫内膜癌风险中的种族/族裔差异:多族裔队列研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb 1;165(3):262-70. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk010. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in epithelial ovarian cancer risk: an analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.种族和民族差异与上皮性卵巢癌风险:卵巢癌协会联盟的分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 3;193(9):1242-1252. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae076.
7
Racial/ethnic differences in postmenopausal endogenous hormones: the multiethnic cohort study.绝经后内源性激素的种族/民族差异:多民族队列研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Oct;15(10):1849-55. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0307.
8
Racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study.不同种族/民族间结直肠癌发病风险的差异:多民族队列研究。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Oct 15;129(8):1899-906. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25822. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
9
Predictors of the timing of natural menopause in the Multiethnic Cohort Study.多民族队列研究中自然绝经时间的预测因素
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jun 1;167(11):1287-94. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn046. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
10
Reproductive Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study.生殖因素与甲状腺癌风险:多民族队列研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Sep;33(9):1158-1165. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0947. Epub 2024 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cellular origins of mucinous ovarian carcinoma.黏液性卵巢癌的细胞起源
J Pathol. 2025 May;266(1):9-25. doi: 10.1002/path.6407. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Racial and ethnic differences in epithelial ovarian cancer risk: an analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.种族和民族差异与上皮性卵巢癌风险:卵巢癌协会联盟的分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 3;193(9):1242-1252. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae076.
3
Menopausal hormone therapy use and risk of ovarian cancer by race: the ovarian cancer in women of African ancestry consortium.绝经激素治疗的使用与种族相关的卵巢癌风险:非裔美国妇女卵巢癌研究联盟。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Dec;129(12):1956-1967. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02407-7. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
4
Body Mass Index and Mammographic Density in a Multiracial and Multiethnic Population-Based Study.基于多民族和多种族人群的研究中,体重指数与乳房 X 光密度的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jul 1;31(7):1313-1323. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1249.
5
Identification of the most common BRCA alterations through analysis of germline mutation databases: Is droplet digital PCR an additional strategy for the assessment of such alterations in breast and ovarian cancer families?通过分析种系突变数据库鉴定最常见的 BRCA 改变:液滴数字 PCR 是否是评估乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族中此类改变的附加策略?
Int J Oncol. 2022 May;60(5). doi: 10.3892/ijo.2022.5349. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
Hawai'i Journal Watch: Highlights of recent research from the University of Hawai'i and the Hawai'i State Department of Health.《夏威夷期刊观察:夏威夷大学和夏威夷州卫生部近期研究亮点》
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Sep 1;79(9):267.

本文引用的文献

1
Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018.卵巢癌统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):284-296. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456. Epub 2018 May 29.
2
Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies.卵巢癌流行病学中的种族/民族差异:12 项病例对照研究的汇总分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;47(2):460-472. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx252.
3
Recent Trends in Ovarian Cancer Incidence and Relative Survival in the United States by Race/Ethnicity and Histologic Subtypes.美国按种族/族裔和组织学亚型划分的卵巢癌发病率和相对生存率的最新趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Oct;26(10):1511-1518. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0290. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Ovarian Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Subtype: An Analysis From the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium.按组织学亚型分类的卵巢癌风险因素:来自卵巢癌队列联盟的分析
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2888-98. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.8178. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
5
Ovarian cancer: epidemiology and risk factors.卵巢癌:流行病学与风险因素
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jan;26(1):55-62. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000217.
6
African Americans and Hispanics Remain at Lower Risk of Ovarian Cancer Than Non-Hispanic Whites after Considering Nongenetic Risk Factors and Oophorectomy Rates.在考虑非遗传风险因素和卵巢切除率后,非裔美国人和西班牙裔患卵巢癌的风险仍低于非西班牙裔白人。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jul;24(7):1094-100. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0023. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
7
Reproductive and hormone-related risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic pathways, invasiveness and histologic subtypes: Results from the EPIC cohort.按组织学途径、侵袭性和组织学亚型分类的上皮性卵巢癌的生殖及激素相关危险因素:欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)队列研究结果
Int J Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;137(5):1196-208. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29471. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Ovarian epithelial tumors and reproductive factors: a systematic review.卵巢上皮性肿瘤与生殖因素:系统综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jun;287(6):1187-204. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2784-1. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
9
Reproductive characteristics in relation to ovarian cancer risk by histologic pathways.组织学途径与卵巢癌风险相关的生殖特征。
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1406-17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des466. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
10
Molecular pathogenesis of endometrial and ovarian cancer.子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌的分子发病机制。
Cancer Biomark. 2010;9(1-6):287-305. doi: 10.3233/CBM-2011-0167.

种族/民族差异与卵巢癌风险:来自多民族队列研究的结果。

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Ovarian Cancer Risk: Results from the Multiethnic Cohort Study.

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Oct;29(10):2019-2025. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0569. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0569
PMID:32732248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7541726/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incidence rates of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) vary across racial/ethnic groups, yet little is known about the impact of hormone-related EOC risk factors in non-Whites.

METHODS

Among 91,625 female Multiethnic Cohort Study participants, 155 incident EOC cases were diagnosed in Whites, 93 in African Americans, 57 in Native Hawaiians, 161 in Japanese Americans, and 141 in Latinas. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between race/ethnicity and EOC risk and between hormone-related factors and EOC risk across racial/ethnic groups.

RESULTS

Compared with Whites, African Americans and Japanese Americans had a lower multivariable-adjusted EOC risk; Native Hawaiians had a suggestive higher risk. Parity and oral contraceptive (OC) use were inversely associated with EOC risk ( race/ethnicity ≥ 0.43); associations were strongest among Japanese Americans (e.g., ≥4 vs. 0 children; HR = 0.45; CI, 0.26-0.79). Age at natural menopause and postmenopausal hormone (PMH) use were not associated with EOC risk in the overall population, but were positively associated with risk in Latinas (e.g., ≥5 years vs. never PMH use; HR = 2.13; CI, 1.30-3.49).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed strong associations with EOC risk for parity and OC use in Japanese Americans and PMH use and age at natural menopause in Latinas. However, differences in EOC risk among racial/ethnic groups were not fully explained by established hormone-related risk factors.

IMPACT

Our study indicates there are racial/ethnic differences in EOC risk and risk factors, and could help improve prevention strategies for non-White women.

摘要

背景

上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的发病率在不同种族/民族群体中存在差异,但对于非白人中与激素相关的 EOC 风险因素的影响知之甚少。

方法

在 91625 名女性多民族队列研究参与者中,白人中有 155 例 EOC 病例确诊,非裔美国人中有 93 例,夏威夷原住民中有 57 例,日裔美国人中有 161 例,拉丁裔中有 141 例。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型来估计种族/民族与 EOC 风险之间的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),以及激素相关因素与不同种族/民族群体中 EOC 风险之间的关联。

结果

与白人相比,非裔美国人和日裔美国人的多变量调整后 EOC 风险较低;夏威夷原住民的风险提示较高。生育次数和口服避孕药(OC)使用与 EOC 风险呈负相关(种族/民族≥0.43);在日裔美国人中关联最强(例如,生育≥4 个孩子与生育 0 个孩子相比;HR=0.45;CI,0.26-0.79)。自然绝经年龄和绝经后激素(PMH)使用与总体人群中的 EOC 风险无关,但与拉丁裔人群的风险呈正相关(例如,绝经后激素使用≥5 年与从不使用绝经后激素相比;HR=2.13;CI,1.30-3.49)。

结论

我们观察到在日裔美国人中生育次数和 OC 使用与 EOC 风险呈强关联,在拉丁裔人群中 PMH 使用和自然绝经年龄与 EOC 风险呈正相关。然而,不同种族/民族群体之间的 EOC 风险差异不能完全用已确定的与激素相关的风险因素来解释。

影响

我们的研究表明,EOC 风险和风险因素在不同种族/民族群体中存在差异,并可能有助于改善针对非白人女性的预防策略。