• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植受者的血管分数流量储备和移植物血管病变。

Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve and Graft Vasculopathy in Heart Transplant Recipients.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, 2278501 Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 12;2020:9835151. doi: 10.1155/2020/9835151. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/9835151
PMID:32733172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7376430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains the Achilles' heel of long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx). The severity and extent of CAV is graded with conventional coronary angiography (COR) which has several limitations. Recently, vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) derived from COR has emerged as a diagnostic computational tool to quantify the functional severity of coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE

The present study assessed the usefulness of vFFR to detect CAV in HTx recipients.

METHODS

In HTx patients referred for annual check-up, undergoing surveillance COR, the extent of CAV was graded according to the criteria proposed by the international society of heart and lung transplantation (ISHLT). In addition, three-dimensional coronary geometries were constructed from COR to calculate pressure losses using vFFR.

RESULTS

In 65 HTx patients with a mean age of 53.7 ± 10.1 years, 8.5 years (IQR 1.90, 15.2) years after HTx, a total number of 173 vessels (59 LAD, 61 LCX, and 53 RCA) were analyzed. The mean vFFR was 0.84 ± 0.15 and median was 0.88 (IQR 0.79, 0.94). A vFFR ≤ 0.80 was present in 24 patients (48 vessels). HTx patients with a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) had numerically lower vFFR as compared to those with non-ICMP (0.70 ± 0.22 vs. 0.79 ± 0.13, = 0.06). The use of vFFR reclassified 31.9% of patients compared to the anatomical ISHLT criteria. Despite a CAV score of 0, a pathological vFFR ≤ 0.80 was detected in 8 patients (34.8%).

CONCLUSION

The impairment in epicardial conductance assessed by vFFR in a subgroup of patients without CAV according to standard ISHLT criteria suggests the presence of a diffuse vasculopathy undetectable by conventional angiography. Therefore, we speculate that vFFR may be useful in risk stratification after HTx.

摘要

背景

心脏同种异体移植血管病(CAV)仍然是心脏移植(HTx)后长期存活的阿喀琉斯之踵。CAV 的严重程度和范围通过常规冠状动脉造影(COR)进行分级,但该方法存在一些局限性。最近,来源于 COR 的血管血流储备分数(vFFR)作为一种诊断计算工具,已经出现并被用于量化冠状动脉疾病的功能严重程度。

目的

本研究旨在评估 vFFR 检测 HTx 受者 CAV 的效用。

方法

在接受年度检查并进行 COR 监测的 HTx 患者中,根据国际心肺移植协会(ISHLT)提出的标准对 CAV 的程度进行分级。此外,从 COR 构建三维冠状动脉几何结构,以使用 vFFR 计算压力损失。

结果

在 65 名 HTx 患者中,中位年龄为 53.7±10.1 岁,HTx 后中位时间为 8.5 年(IQR 1.90,15.2),共分析了 173 支血管(59 支 LAD、61 支 LCX 和 53 支 RCA)。平均 vFFR 为 0.84±0.15,中位数为 0.88(IQR 0.79,0.94)。24 名患者(48 支血管)的 vFFR≤0.80。与非缺血性心肌病(ICMP)患者相比,有缺血性心肌病(ICMP)病史的 HTx 患者的 vFFR 数值较低(0.70±0.22 比 0.79±0.13, = 0.06)。与解剖学 ISHLT 标准相比,vFFR 重新分类了 31.9%的患者。尽管 CAV 评分为 0,但在 8 名患者(34.8%)中仍检测到病理性 vFFR≤0.80。

结论

根据标准 ISHLT 标准,在无 CAV 的患者亚组中,vFFR 评估的心外膜传导受损表明存在常规血管造影无法检测到的弥漫性血管病。因此,我们推测 vFFR 可能对 HTx 后风险分层有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/691d/7376430/8b6866fecffa/JITC2020-9835151.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/691d/7376430/98360185a972/JITC2020-9835151.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/691d/7376430/8b6866fecffa/JITC2020-9835151.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/691d/7376430/98360185a972/JITC2020-9835151.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/691d/7376430/8b6866fecffa/JITC2020-9835151.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve and Graft Vasculopathy in Heart Transplant Recipients.心脏移植受者的血管分数流量储备和移植物血管病变。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 12;2020:9835151. doi: 10.1155/2020/9835151. eCollection 2020.
2
Validation of Coronary Angiography-Derived Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve in Heart Transplant Patients with Suspected Graft Vasculopathy.冠状动脉造影衍生的血管血流储备分数在疑似移植物血管病变的心脏移植患者中的验证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;11(10):1750. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101750.
3
Evaluation of longitudinal myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in heart transplant recipients: relation to coronary allograft vasculopathy.二维斑点追踪超声心动图评估心脏移植受者的纵向心肌变形:与冠状动脉移植血管病的关系
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Feb;34(2):195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
4
European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging/Cardiovascular Imaging Department of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology recommendations for the use of cardiac imaging to assess and follow patients after heart transplantation.欧洲心血管影像协会/巴西心脏病学会心血管影像学部关于心脏移植后评估和随访患者使用心脏影像的建议。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):919-48. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev139. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Optical coherence tomography for characterization of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in late survivors of pediatric heart transplantation.光学相干断层扫描用于儿童心脏移植后晚期幸存者心脏移植物血管病的特征描述。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Jan;35(1):74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
6
Long-term outcome of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: Importance of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation angiographic grading scale.心脏移植后血管病的长期预后:国际心肺移植学会血管造影分级标准的重要性。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Nov;38(11):1189-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
7
Myocardial Perfusion Reserve and Strain-Encoded CMR for Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft Microvasculopathy.心肌灌注储备和应变编码心脏磁共振成像用于评估心脏移植微血管病变
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;9(3):255-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.012.
8
The prognostic value of angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention: The FAST Outcome study.基于血管造影的经皮冠状动脉介入术后血流储备分数的预后价值:FAST Outcome 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;359:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.021. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
Reduction of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy by PCI: Quantification and Correlation With Outcome After Heart Transplantation.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗减少心脏移植后冠脉血管病:心脏移植后定量分析及其与结局的相关性。
J Card Fail. 2024 Oct;30(10):1222-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.07.011.
10
Three-dimensional QCA-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) in Heart Team decision-making: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.基于三维定量冠状动脉造影的血管血流储备分数(vFFR)在心脏团队决策中的应用:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e054202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054202.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Computed Tomography and Other Non-Invasive and Invasive Imaging Modalities in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.计算机断层扫描及其他非侵入性和侵入性成像方式在心脏移植血管病变中的作用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jun 27;12(7):249. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12070249.
2
Microcirculation and intravascular imaging assessment in heart transplant recipients for detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a pilot study.心脏移植受者中用于检测心脏移植血管病变的微循环和血管内成像评估:一项试点研究。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2025 Mar;21(1):63-66. doi: 10.5114/aic.2025.147986. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Invasive Coronary Imaging Assessment for Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: State-of-the-Art Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: A review.心脏移植血管病:综述。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):E527-E536. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27893. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
2
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
3
Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.血管造影衍生的血流储备分数的诊断性能:系统评价和贝叶斯荟萃分析。
心脏移植血管病变的有创冠状动脉成像评估:最新综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 May 13;1(4):100344. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100344. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
4
Invasive Coronary Physiology in Heart Transplant Recipients: State-of-the-Art Review.心脏移植受者的有创冠状动脉生理学:最新综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 21;2(3):100627. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100627. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
5
Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Challenges and Advances in Invasive and Non-Invasive Diagnostic Modalities.心脏移植血管病变:有创和无创诊断方法的挑战与进展
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Mar 21;11(3):95. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11030095.
6
Validation of Coronary Angiography-Derived Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve in Heart Transplant Patients with Suspected Graft Vasculopathy.冠状动脉造影衍生的血管血流储备分数在疑似移植物血管病变的心脏移植患者中的验证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;11(10):1750. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101750.
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 14;39(35):3314-3321. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy445.
4
Changes in Outcomes of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Over 30 Years Following Heart Transplantation.心脏移植后 30 多年心脏移植后心脏移植物血管病结局的变化。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;5(12):891-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.09.014.
5
State of the art: coronary angiography.现状:冠状动脉造影术。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Aug 25;13(6):634-643. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00465.
6
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会/美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏协会/美国超声心动图学会/美国核心脏病学会/心血管造影和介入学会/心血管计算机断层扫描学会/胸外科医师学会2017年稳定型缺血性心脏病患者冠状动脉血运重建适宜性标准:美国心脏病学会适宜性标准工作组、美国胸外科协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核心脏病学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会及胸外科医师学会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 2;69(17):2212-2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Allograft Vasculopathy: The Achilles' Heel of Heart Transplantation.同种异体移植血管病:心脏移植的阿喀琉斯之踵。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 5;68(1):80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.033.
8
Invasive Assessment of Coronary Physiology Predicts Late Mortality After Heart Transplantation.冠状动脉生理学的侵入性评估可预测心脏移植后的晚期死亡率。
Circulation. 2016 May 17;133(20):1945-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018741. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组编写,欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Endothelial dysfunction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.内皮功能障碍与心脏同种异体移植物血管病。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013 Apr;6(2):263-77. doi: 10.1007/s12265-012-9414-3. Epub 2012 Nov 8.