Mazzi Chiara, Mazzeo Gaetano, Savazzi Silvia
Perception and Awareness (PandA) Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jul 7;14:36. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00036. eCollection 2020.
Contrastive analysis has been widely employed in the search for the electrophysiological neural correlates of consciousness. However, despite its clear logic, it has been argued that it may not succeed in isolating neural processes solely involved in the emergence of perceptual awareness. In fact, data from contrastive analysis would be contaminated by potential confounding factors reflecting distinct, though related, processes either preceding or following the conscious perception. At present, the ERP components representing the proper correlates of perceptual awareness still remain to be identified among those correlating with awareness (i.e., Visual Awareness Negativity, VAN and Late Positivity, LP). In order to dissociate visual awareness from post-perceptual confounds specifically related to decision making, we manipulated the response criterion, which affects how a percept is translated into a decision. In particular, while performing an orientation discrimination task, participants were asked to shift their response criterion across sessions. As a consequence, the resulting modulation should concern the ERP component(s) not exclusively reflecting mechanisms regulating the subjective conscious experience itself but rather the processes accompanying it. Electrophysiological results showed that N1 and P3 were sensitive to the response criterion adopted by participants. Additionally, the more the participants shifted their response criterion, the bigger the ERP modulation was; this was consequently indicative of the critical role of these components in the decision-making processes regardless of awareness level. When considering data independently from the response criterion, the aware vs. unaware contrast showed that both VAN and LP were significant. Crucially, the LP component was also modulated by the interaction of awareness and response criterion, while VAN results to be unaffected. In agreement with previous literature, these findings provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that VAN tracks the emergence of visual awareness by encoding the conscious percept, whereas LP reflects the contribution from post-perceptual processes related to response requirements. This excludes a direct functional role of this later component in giving rise to perceptual awareness.
对比分析已被广泛应用于寻找意识的电生理神经关联。然而,尽管其逻辑清晰,但有人认为它可能无法成功分离出仅与知觉意识出现相关的神经过程。事实上,对比分析的数据会受到潜在混杂因素的影响,这些因素反映了在有意识感知之前或之后的不同但相关的过程。目前,在与意识相关的那些成分(即视觉意识负波,VAN和晚期正波,LP)中,代表知觉意识适当关联的ERP成分仍有待确定。为了将视觉意识与与决策特别相关的知觉后混杂因素区分开来,我们操纵了反应标准,这会影响知觉如何转化为决策。具体而言,在执行方向辨别任务时,要求参与者在不同的实验环节中改变他们的反应标准。因此,由此产生的调制应该涉及那些并非专门反映调节主观意识体验本身的机制,而是伴随它的过程的ERP成分。电生理结果表明,N1和P3对参与者采用的反应标准敏感。此外,参与者改变反应标准的程度越大,ERP调制就越大;这因此表明这些成分在决策过程中起着关键作用,而与意识水平无关。当独立于反应标准考虑数据时,有意识与无意识的对比表明VAN和LP都是显著的。至关重要的是,LP成分也受到意识和反应标准相互作用的调制,而VAN结果不受影响。与先前的文献一致,这些发现提供了证据支持以下假设:VAN通过编码有意识的知觉来追踪视觉意识的出现,而LP反映了与反应要求相关的知觉后过程的贡献。这排除了这个后期成分在产生知觉意识方面的直接功能作用。