Suppr超能文献

取出植入式心脏电子设备能否改善菌血症患者的预后?

Does extraction of cardiac implantable electronic devices improve outcome in patients with bacteraemia?

作者信息

Snygg-Martin Ulrika, Ruus Christoffer, Skovbjerg Susann, Studahl Marie, Andersson Lars-Magnus

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Infect Dis (Lond). 2020 Nov-Dec;52(12):877-882. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1799070. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

bacteraemia (SAB) is recognized as an infection that is difficult to treat and with high risk of device related infection. Extraction/explantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is recommended in SAB patients but studies evaluating long-term prognosis are scarce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 626 consecutive SAB patients were identified in routine diagnostics (November 2014-October 2016). Patient characteristic, infective endocarditis (IE) incidence and mortality were compared for patients with and without CIED.

RESULTS

SAB patients with CIED ( = 33) compared to non-CIED patients ( = 593) were older (83 versus 70 years,  = .0001), had a higher 30-day mortality (12/33, 36% versus 119/593, 20%,  = .044) and higher incidence of IE (9/33, 27% versus 41/593, 7%,  = .0006). One-year mortality was 19/33 (58%) among the SAB CIED patients. Echocardiography was performed in all nine patients with CIED-IE but only in 14/24 (58%) of the 24 SAB CIED patients that were considered not having IE. However, if patients with very early mortality were excluded, echocardiography was performed in 14/17 (82%) of SAB CIED-non-IE patients. CIED extraction/explantation during intravenous antibiotic treatment was only performed in three patients with SAB CIED-IE and in one non-IE patient. One year post treatment initiation, 14 out of 33 SAB CIED patients were alive of whom only one had CIED extraction/explantation performed as part of treatment.

CONCLUSION

bacteraemia in CIED patients is associated with poor prognosis but in a subgroup of patients survival beyond one year was seen despite retainment of the electronic device.

摘要

背景

血流感染(SAB)被认为是一种难以治疗且与器械相关感染风险高的感染。对于SAB患者,建议取出/移除心脏植入式电子设备(CIED),但评估长期预后的研究较少。

材料与方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,在常规诊断中(2014年11月至2016年10月)确定了626例连续的SAB患者。比较了有和没有CIED的患者的患者特征、感染性心内膜炎(IE)发病率和死亡率。

结果

与无CIED的患者(n = 593)相比,有CIED的SAB患者(n = 33)年龄更大(83岁对70岁,P = 0.0001),30天死亡率更高(12/33,36%对119/593,20%,P = 0.044),IE发病率更高(9/33,27%对41/593,7%,P = 0.0006)。SAB CIED患者的一年死亡率为19/33(58%)。所有9例CIED-IE患者均进行了超声心动图检查,但在24例被认为没有IE的SAB CIED患者中,仅14/24(58%)进行了检查。然而,如果排除早期死亡率极高的患者,14/17(82%)的SAB CIED-非IE患者进行了超声心动图检查。仅3例SAB CIED-IE患者和1例非IE患者在静脉抗生素治疗期间进行了CIED取出/移除。治疗开始一年后,33例SAB CIED患者中有14例存活,其中只有1例在治疗过程中进行了CIED取出/移除。

结论

CIED患者的血流感染与预后不良相关,但在一个亚组患者中,尽管保留了电子设备,仍观察到有超过一年的生存期。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验