Snygg-Martin Ulrika, Ruus Christoffer, Skovbjerg Susann, Studahl Marie, Andersson Lars-Magnus
Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Infect Dis (Lond). 2020 Nov-Dec;52(12):877-882. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1799070. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
bacteraemia (SAB) is recognized as an infection that is difficult to treat and with high risk of device related infection. Extraction/explantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is recommended in SAB patients but studies evaluating long-term prognosis are scarce.
In this retrospective cohort study, 626 consecutive SAB patients were identified in routine diagnostics (November 2014-October 2016). Patient characteristic, infective endocarditis (IE) incidence and mortality were compared for patients with and without CIED.
SAB patients with CIED ( = 33) compared to non-CIED patients ( = 593) were older (83 versus 70 years, = .0001), had a higher 30-day mortality (12/33, 36% versus 119/593, 20%, = .044) and higher incidence of IE (9/33, 27% versus 41/593, 7%, = .0006). One-year mortality was 19/33 (58%) among the SAB CIED patients. Echocardiography was performed in all nine patients with CIED-IE but only in 14/24 (58%) of the 24 SAB CIED patients that were considered not having IE. However, if patients with very early mortality were excluded, echocardiography was performed in 14/17 (82%) of SAB CIED-non-IE patients. CIED extraction/explantation during intravenous antibiotic treatment was only performed in three patients with SAB CIED-IE and in one non-IE patient. One year post treatment initiation, 14 out of 33 SAB CIED patients were alive of whom only one had CIED extraction/explantation performed as part of treatment.
bacteraemia in CIED patients is associated with poor prognosis but in a subgroup of patients survival beyond one year was seen despite retainment of the electronic device.
血流感染(SAB)被认为是一种难以治疗且与器械相关感染风险高的感染。对于SAB患者,建议取出/移除心脏植入式电子设备(CIED),但评估长期预后的研究较少。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,在常规诊断中(2014年11月至2016年10月)确定了626例连续的SAB患者。比较了有和没有CIED的患者的患者特征、感染性心内膜炎(IE)发病率和死亡率。
与无CIED的患者(n = 593)相比,有CIED的SAB患者(n = 33)年龄更大(83岁对70岁,P = 0.0001),30天死亡率更高(12/33,36%对119/593,20%,P = 0.044),IE发病率更高(9/33,27%对41/593,7%,P = 0.0006)。SAB CIED患者的一年死亡率为19/33(58%)。所有9例CIED-IE患者均进行了超声心动图检查,但在24例被认为没有IE的SAB CIED患者中,仅14/24(58%)进行了检查。然而,如果排除早期死亡率极高的患者,14/17(82%)的SAB CIED-非IE患者进行了超声心动图检查。仅3例SAB CIED-IE患者和1例非IE患者在静脉抗生素治疗期间进行了CIED取出/移除。治疗开始一年后,33例SAB CIED患者中有14例存活,其中只有1例在治疗过程中进行了CIED取出/移除。
CIED患者的血流感染与预后不良相关,但在一个亚组患者中,尽管保留了电子设备,仍观察到有超过一年的生存期。