Lee Cameron C, Lawler Matthew E, Tannyhill R John, Dodson Thomas B, Peacock Zachary S
Resident, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Former Resident, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Nov;78(11):2010-2017. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.06.034. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
Treating mandibular fractures urgently is controversial. The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the rates of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) in patients with isolated mandibular fractures treated in a nonurgent manner by an outpatient protocol versus a traditional, urgent inpatient protocol.
We implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of patients with isolated mandibular fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF). The primary predictor variable was the treatment protocol: outpatient (elective) or inpatient (urgent). The outpatient group was treated with closed reduction and intermaxillary fixation, discharged, and scheduled for definitive treatment as outpatients. The inpatient group was admitted to the hospital, and the fracture was treated with ORIF as soon as possible. The primary outcome variable was POIC (present or absent). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between the treatment protocol and POICs, with statistical significance set at P < .05.
The study sample was composed of 193 patients, with 82 in the outpatient group and 111 in the inpatient group. The frequency of POICs was 17.1% and 18.9% in the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively (P = .13; relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.0). The time to ORIF was not significantly associated with POICs (P = .71). After adjustment for treatment group, fracture location, and time to fracture stabilization, smoking (P = .04, odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.1) and intraoral incision with a transbuccal trocar (P = .02, odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.8) were associated with an increased risk of POICs. Length of stay was 0.6 ± 0.8 days in the outpatient group compared with 2.7 ± 2.0 days in the inpatient group (P < .0001).
An outpatient model to treat isolated mandibular fractures was not associated with an increased risk of POICs. This outpatient care model reduced the hospital length of stay without increasing the risk of POICs.
紧急治疗下颌骨骨折存在争议。本研究的目的是评估和比较采用门诊方案非紧急治疗与传统紧急住院方案治疗的孤立性下颌骨骨折患者术后炎症并发症(POICs)的发生率。
我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗的孤立性下颌骨骨折患者样本。主要预测变量是治疗方案:门诊(择期)或住院(紧急)。门诊组采用闭合复位和颌间固定,出院后安排作为门诊患者进行确定性治疗。住院组入院后,骨折尽快采用ORIF治疗。主要结局变量是POIC(存在或不存在)。计算描述性、双变量和多因素逻辑回归统计量,以衡量治疗方案与POICs之间的关联,设定P <.05为具有统计学意义。
研究样本由193例患者组成,门诊组82例,住院组111例。门诊组和住院组的POICs发生率分别为17.1%和18.9%(P =.13;相对风险,0.80;95%置信区间[CI],0.62至1.)。ORIF的时间与POICs无显著关联(P =.71)。在对治疗组、骨折部位和骨折稳定时间进行调整后,吸烟(P =.04,比值比,2.3;95%CI,1.0至5.1)和经颊套管针口腔内切口(P =.02,比值比,3.4;95%CI,1.2至9.8)与POICs风险增加相关。门诊组住院时间为0.6±0.8天,住院组为2.7±2.0天(P <.0001)。
治疗孤立性下颌骨骨折的门诊模式与POICs风险增加无关。这种门诊护理模式缩短了住院时间,且未增加POICs风险。