• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 MRI 引导活检途径中病变大小和 PSA 密度的不同,比较前列腺活检的活检策略。

Comparison of biopsy strategies for prostate biopsy according to lesion size and PSA density in MRI-directed biopsy pathway.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4166-4177. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02667-4. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-020-02667-4
PMID:32737545
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and the added value of focal saturation biopsy and systematic biopsy (SBx) differ according to index lesion size, and to compare the current guidelines for csPCa detection.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive men who underwent MRI and subsequent SBx and MRI-targeted biopsy (TBx) for a suspicious lesion between April 2019 and February 2020. Lesion visibility on transrectal ultrasound (US) and added value of focal saturation biopsy and SBx were compared according to index lesion size using chi-square and McNemar tests. csPCa detection rates and the proportion of biopsy-indicated men were compared among four biopsy strategies based on current guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 313 men evaluated (median age, 65; interquartile range 60‒71), csPCa was detected in 110 (35%). In lesions < 10 mm, greater US invisibility (42.7% of lesions < 10 mm versus 20.0% of lesions ≥ 10 mm; p < 0.001) and higher added value of focal saturation biopsy and SBx (11.1% and 17.1% in lesions < 10 mm versus 4.2% and 6.3% in lesions ≥ 10 mm) were observed, compared with lesions ≥ 10 mm. Consideration of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density > 0.15 ng/mL/mL as a cutoff in unsuspicious MRI led to a 14% reduction (44/313) in men who needed biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Determination of the biopsy strategy in terms of the need for focal saturation biopsy or SBx should be made considering lesion size. The use of PSA density in non-suspicious MRI can lead to a reduction in biopsy-indicated men.

摘要

目的

探讨可疑前列腺癌(csPCa)的检测是否与病灶大小有关,以及局灶性饱和活检和系统活检(SBx)的附加价值是否不同,并比较当前 csPCa 检测指南。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 2 月期间因可疑病灶接受 MRI 检查和随后 SBx 及 MRI 靶向活检(TBx)的连续男性患者。使用卡方检验和 McNemar 检验比较经直肠超声(TRUS)上病灶的可视性以及局灶性饱和活检和 SBx 的附加价值与病灶大小的关系。根据当前指南,比较了 4 种活检策略下 csPCa 的检出率和需要活检的患者比例。

结果

在 313 例接受评估的男性患者中(中位年龄 65 岁,四分位间距 60-71 岁),110 例(35%)患者检出 csPCa。在病灶<10mm 时,TRUS 上的病灶可视性更低(42.7%的病灶<10mm 与 20.0%的病灶≥10mm相比;p<0.001),局灶性饱和活检和 SBx 的附加价值更高(病灶<10mm 时分别为 11.1%和 17.1%,病灶≥10mm 时分别为 4.2%和 6.3%)。考虑将前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度>0.15ng/mL/ml 作为可疑 MRI 中的截断值,可使需要活检的男性患者减少 14%(44/313)。

结论

根据需要进行局灶性饱和活检或 SBx 的策略,应考虑病灶大小。在非可疑 MRI 中使用 PSA 密度可以减少需要活检的患者数量。

相似文献

1
Comparison of biopsy strategies for prostate biopsy according to lesion size and PSA density in MRI-directed biopsy pathway.根据 MRI 引导活检途径中病变大小和 PSA 密度的不同,比较前列腺活检的活检策略。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4166-4177. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02667-4. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.经会阴模板引导式饱和与靶向前列腺活检的男性前列腺癌检出率。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/pros.24286. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.MRI 靶向引导下的前列腺活检:明智应用额外系统活检的探索。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7544-7554. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08822-3. Epub 2022 May 4.
4
Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.评估多参数磁共振成像阳性在疑似前列腺癌年轻男性中的临床价值。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.评价经会阴 MRI/超声融合前列腺活检术诊断单个单侧可疑 MRI 异常的男性患者的最佳策略。
Prostate. 2023 Sep;83(13):1255-1262. doi: 10.1002/pros.24585. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.多参数磁共振成像异常的男性患者接受磁共振成像-经直肠超声融合前列腺活检的最佳采样方案
Urol Oncol. 2019 Jan;37(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Tailoring biopsy strategy in the MRI-fusion prostate biopsy era: systematic, targeted or neither?MRI融合前列腺活检时代的活检策略调整:系统性、靶向性还是两者皆非?
BMC Urol. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01553-1.
9
Optimizing prostate-targeted biopsy schemes in men with multiple mpMRI visible lesions: should we target all suspicious areas? Results of a two institution series.多参数 MRI 可见病灶男性中前列腺靶向活检方案的优化:我们是否应该针对所有可疑区域?两家机构系列研究的结果。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Dec;24(4):1137-1142. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00371-y. Epub 2021 May 3.
10
Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.弹性融合活检的准确性:比较靶向和系统活检对前列腺癌的检出率。
Prostate. 2023 Feb;83(2):162-168. doi: 10.1002/pros.24449. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
[Predictive effect of the dual-parametric MRI modified maximum diameter of the lesions with PI-RADS 4 and 5 on the clinically significant prostate cancer].[双参数MRI修正病变最大径联合PI-RADS 4和5对临床显著前列腺癌的预测作用]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Aug 18;56(4):567-574. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.04.004.
2
Diagnostic performance of regional systematic biopsy for prostate cancer stratified by PI-RADS and histologic zones.根据PI-RADS和组织学区域分层的前列腺癌区域系统活检的诊断性能
Insights Imaging. 2024 May 16;15(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01680-1.
3
A novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer: targeted and regional systematic biopsy.

本文引用的文献

1
MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向、系统和联合活检在前列腺癌诊断中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.
2
Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Using Clinical Parameters to Predict Negative and Indeterminate Findings.利用临床参数预测前列腺多参数磁共振成像阴性和不确定结果,减少不必要的检查。
J Urol. 2020 Feb;203(2):292-298. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000518. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
Necessity of differentiating small (< 10 mm) and large (≥ 10 mm) PI-RADS 4.
一种新的前列腺癌活检方案:靶向和区域性系统活检。
BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 13;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01461-4.
4
Do we need MRI in all biopsy naïve patients? A multicenter cohort analysis.所有初次活检的患者都需要做 MRI 吗?一项多中心队列分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Feb 7;42(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04780-1.
5
Ipsilateral hemigland prostate biopsy may underestimate cancer burden in patients with unilateral mpMRI-visible lesions.同侧半腺体前列腺活检可能低估了单侧 mpMRI 可见病变患者的肿瘤负担。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Mar;48(3):1079-1089. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03775-z. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
6
Diagnostic Performance of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted plus Regional Biopsy Approach in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.磁共振成像引导的靶向加区域活检方法在前列腺癌诊断中的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 May 2;40:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.
有必要对 PI-RADS 4 评分小(< 10mm)和大(≥ 10mm)的前列腺癌进行区分。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1473-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02924-2. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
Optimising the number of cores for magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted and systematic transperineal prostate biopsy.优化磁共振成像引导下靶向和系统经会阴前列腺活检的核心数量。
BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):260-269. doi: 10.1111/bju.14865. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study.靶向与系统前列腺活检在初次活检的男性中的比较:前列腺癌的图像配准前瞻性评估(PAIREDCAP)研究。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):811-818. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1734.
6
PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway.PI-RADS 指导委员会:PI-RADS 多参数 MRI 和 MRI 引导活检途径。
Radiology. 2019 Aug;292(2):464-474. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.磁共振成像引导靶向活检与系统活检检测前列腺癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):284-303. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 May 24.
8
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版:前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版 2019 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
The SmartTarget Biopsy Trial: A Prospective, Within-person Randomised, Blinded Trial Comparing the Accuracy of Visual-registration and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Image-fusion Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.SmartTarget 活检试验:一项前瞻性、个体内随机、盲法试验,比较了视觉登记和磁共振成像/超声图像融合靶向活检在前列腺癌风险分层中的准确性。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):733-740. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
10
Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.基于多参数 MRI 的前列腺系统和靶向活检在初次活检患者中的应用(MRI-FIRST):一项前瞻性、多中心、配对诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):100-109. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30569-2. Epub 2018 Nov 21.