Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2021 Jul;313(5):357-365. doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02108-8. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
Dexamethasone oral mini-pulse (OMP) is commonly used to halt progression of non-segmental vitiligo (NSV). There is an unmet need for non-phototherapy, non-corticosteroid therapeutic options for stabilizing actively spreading NSV. To assess the efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil in stabilizing active NSV in comparison to OMP. In this prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study, 50 patients of active vitiligo [baseline vitiligo disease activity (VIDA) score 4] were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. Group A received oral dexamethasone (2.5 mg on two successive days a week) and group B received mycophenolate mofetil (up to 2 g) for 180 days with a treatment-free follow-up period of 90 days. Assessment was done using VIDA, number of new lesions in past 30 days, and Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Arrest of disease progression was defined as the absence of any new lesions in past 30 days. Twenty-five patients received OMP (group A, 11 males, 14 females), and 25 received mycophenolate (group B, 12 males, 13 females). In both groups, Kruskal-Wallis revealed a significant trend for reduction in VIDA and the number of new lesions in last 30 days, over the treatment and follow-up duration when compared to baseline (p < 0.001). The first significant reduction in VIDA was noticed on 90th day in groups A and B (p < 0.001). In both groups, VIDA reduced significantly at the 180th day compared to baseline (p < 0.001, WMP), only to increase significantly at the 270th day (p < 0.001, WMP). VIDA in group B was marginally higher at 270 days than group A (p 0.03; Mann-Whitney). Eighteen and 17 patients achieved VIDA 2 + on the 180th day in groups A and B, respectively. The mean number of new lesions in last 30 days reduced significantly in both groups at the 180th day (p < 0.001) and 270th day [p < 0.001; Wilcoxon matched pairs (WMP)] when compared to baseline; but increased significantly at the 270th day compared to the 180th day (p 0.006 WMP). Twenty patients in group A and 18 patients in group B had arrest of the disease activity with treatment. Mean duration to arrest disease progression was 47.2 ± 12.1 days in group A, and 52.5 ± 9.3 days in group B; p 0.21. The difference between VASI at baseline and VASI at the 180 and 270th days was non-significant in both groups (p 0.18 WMP). Five patients in each group failed the respective treatments. Acne (n = 3), weight gain (n = 3), headache, insomnia and menstrual irregularity (n = 1 each) were the important adverse effects noted with dexamethasone pulse; whereas nausea (n = 6) and diarrhea (n = 4) were the commonest adverse effects noted with mycophenolate. Two patients in group B discontinued treatment because of leucopenia (n = 1) and transaminitis (n = 1) that resolved after the discontinuation of mycophenolate. Both OMP and mycophenolate mofetil halt actively spreading vitiligo, and have distinct adverse effect profiles. These should be offered in progressive vitiligo, especially in circumstances precluding the use of phototherapy. Relapse occurred significantly earlier with mycophenolate, and relapse rate was higher (though non-significant) than dexamethasone OMP. The repigmentation potential is minimal for both therapies. This study was approved by Institute Ethics Committee, and retrospectively registered with clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2018/02/011,664).
地塞米松口服迷你脉冲(OMP)常用于阻止非节段性白癜风(NSV)的进展。对于正在扩散的 NSV,存在着对非光疗、非皮质类固醇治疗方法的未满足需求。本研究旨在评估口服吗替麦考酚酯在稳定活动性 NSV 方面的疗效,并与 OMP 进行比较。在这项前瞻性、随机、研究者盲法研究中,将 50 例活动性白癜风患者(基线白癜风疾病活动评分[VIDA]为 4 分)按 1:1 的比例随机分为两组。组 A 患者接受口服地塞米松(每周连续 2 天,每次 2.5mg),组 B 患者接受吗替麦考酚酯(最多 2g)治疗 180 天,随后进行 90 天的无治疗随访期。使用 VIDA、过去 30 天的新病变数量和白癜风面积评分指数(VASI)进行评估。疾病进展的停止定义为过去 30 天内无新病变。25 例患者接受 OMP(组 A,11 名男性,14 名女性),25 例患者接受吗替麦考酚酯(组 B,12 名男性,13 名女性)。在两组中,Kruskal-Wallis 分析显示,与基线相比,在治疗和随访期间,VIDA 和过去 30 天的新病变数量均呈显著下降趋势(p<0.001)。组 A 和 B 均在第 90 天首次观察到 VIDA 显著降低(p<0.001)。在两组中,第 180 天与基线相比,VIDA 显著降低(p<0.001,WMP),仅在第 270 天显著升高(p<0.001,WMP)。第 270 天组 B 的 VIDA 略高于组 A(p0.03;Mann-Whitney)。第 180 天,组 A 和 B 分别有 18 例和 17 例患者达到 VIDA 2+。在两组中,第 180 天和第 270 天,过去 30 天的新病变数量均显著减少(p<0.001),与基线相比;但与第 180 天相比,第 270 天显著增加(p<0.006,WMP)。组 A 中有 20 例患者和组 B 中有 18 例患者的疾病活动得到了控制。组 A 疾病进展停止的平均时间为 47.2±12.1 天,组 B 为 52.5±9.3 天;p0.21。两组基线和第 180 天、第 270 天的 VASI 之间的差异无统计学意义(p0.18,WMP)。每组均有 5 例患者治疗失败。地塞米松脉冲治疗的重要不良反应包括痤疮(n=3)、体重增加(n=3)、头痛、失眠和月经不规律(n=1);而吗替麦考酚酯最常见的不良反应是恶心(n=6)和腹泻(n=4)。组 B 中有 2 例患者因白细胞减少症(n=1)和转氨基酶升高(n=1)而停止治疗,停药后这些不良反应均得到了缓解。OMP 和吗替麦考酚酯均可阻止活动性白癜风的扩散,且具有不同的不良反应特征。在进行性白癜风中,特别是在不能使用光疗的情况下,应使用这些药物。与吗替麦考酚酯相比,复发时间更早,复发率更高(尽管无统计学意义)。两种治疗方法的复色潜力都很小。本研究获得了机构伦理委员会的批准,并在印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI/2018/02/011,664)进行了回顾性注册。