Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Abejas LABUN, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Neotrop Entomol. 2020 Aug;49(4):533-544. doi: 10.1007/s13744-020-00804-8. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
Mutualistic interactions between bees and flowering plants have been widely recognized as one of the most important for the maintenance of these communities throughout ecosystems. Consequently, understanding how these interactions occur is highly important, especially in seasonal dry tropical forest (SDTF), one of the most endangered ecosystems in northern South America. In this study, we analyzed the changes between interaction networks across two well-defined seasons, dry and wet, in a SDTF of the Colombian Caribbean in Taganga, Magdalena. We also determined changes in species composition and their role in interaction networks. To study this system, we compared two approaches: (1) networks constructed with data from direct collections in flowering plants, and (2) networks constructed with pollen data obtained from bees' bodies. A total of 44 species were collected in 18 species of flowering plants; also, we registered 16 additional plants presented in the records only as pollen types. We found that network metrics, connectance, nestedness, specialization (H2'), and interaction strength asymmetry remain stable through seasons. However, when the two types of approximations were compared, there were significant differences. Networks constructed with pollen data are more connected, less specialized, and with lower values of interaction strength asymmetry. The major difference between seasons relied on the interacting species composition, due to a high species turnover. Bee community was more diverse in dry season. Apidae family, mainly eusocial species, persisted in the community, being more abundant and relevant in wet season. For dry season, Megachile and other solitary species from Apidae and Halictidae families were better represented and relevant for the community. We found that Fabaceae is an important resource for bees in both seasons. In addition, herbaceous species from Asteraceae and Convolvulaceae were preferred in wet season, while shrub and tree species from Fabaceae and Polygonaceae were the main resource in dry season.
在生态系统中,蜜蜂和开花植物之间的互利共生关系被广泛认为是维持这些群落的最重要关系之一。因此,了解这些相互作用是如何发生的非常重要,特别是在季节性干燥的热带森林(SDTF)中,这是南美洲北部最濒危的生态系统之一。在这项研究中,我们分析了在哥伦比亚加勒比地区塔甘加的 SDTF 中,两个定义明确的季节(旱季和雨季)之间的相互作用网络的变化。我们还确定了物种组成及其在相互作用网络中的作用的变化。为了研究这个系统,我们比较了两种方法:(1)使用来自开花植物的直接采集数据构建的网络;(2)使用从蜜蜂身体中获得的花粉数据构建的网络。我们共收集了 18 种开花植物中的 44 种;此外,我们还记录了 16 种仅作为花粉类型出现的植物。我们发现,网络指标,连接度、嵌套性、专业化(H2')和相互作用强度不对称性在整个季节都保持稳定。然而,当比较两种类型的近似时,存在显著差异。使用花粉数据构建的网络连接度更高,专业化程度更低,相互作用强度不对称性的值更低。季节之间的主要区别在于相互作用的物种组成,由于物种周转率较高。在旱季,蜜蜂群落的多样性更高。在雨季,Apoidea 科的社会性物种主要是 Apidae 科的蜜蜂,在群落中更为丰富和重要。在旱季,Megachile 和其他来自 Apidae 和 Halictidae 科的独居物种的代表性更强,对群落更重要。我们发现豆科植物是蜜蜂在两个季节的重要资源。此外,在雨季,菊科和旋花科的草本植物是首选,而在旱季,豆科和Polygonaceae 的灌木和乔木物种是主要资源。