Department of Pharmacology, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
FASEB J. 2020 Sep;34(9):11577-11593. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902515RR. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
Targeted drug delivery to the endothelium has the potential to generate localized therapeutic effects at the blood-tissue interface. For some therapeutic cargoes, it is essential to maintain contact with the bloodstream to exert protective effects. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of endothelial surface-targeted affinity ligands and biotherapeutic cargo remain a largely unexplored area, despite obvious translational implications for this strategy. To bridge this gap, we site-specifically radiolabeled mono- (scFv) and bivalent (mAb) affinity ligands specific for the endothelial cell adhesion molecules, PECAM-1 (CD31) and ICAM-1 (CD54). Radiotracing revealed similar lung biodistribution at 30 minutes post-injection (79.3% ± 4.2% vs 80.4% ± 10.6% ID/g for αICAM and 58.9% ± 3.6% ID/g vs. 47.7% ± 5.8% ID/g for αPECAM mAb vs. scFv), but marked differences in organ residence time, with antibodies demonstrating an order of magnitude greater area under the lung concentration vs. time curve (AUC 1698 ± 352 vs. 53.3 ± 7.9 ID/ghrs for αICAM and 1023 ± 507 vs. 114 ± 37 ID/ghrs for αPECAM mAb vs scFv). A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model, fit to and validated using these data, indicated contributions from both superior binding characteristics and prolonged circulation time supporting multiple binding-detachment cycles. We tested the ability of each affinity ligand to deliver a prototypical surface cargo, thrombomodulin (TM), using one-to-one protein conjugates. Bivalent mAb-TM was superior to monovalent scFv-TM in both pulmonary targeting and lung residence time (AUC 141 ± 3.2 vs 12.4 ± 4.2 ID/ghrs for ICAM and 188 ± 90 vs 34.7 ± 19.9 ID/ghrs for PECAM), despite having similar blood PK, indicating that binding strength is more important parameter than the kinetics of binding. To maximize bivalent target engagement, we synthesized an oriented, end-to-end anti-ICAM mAb-TM conjugate and found that this therapeutic had the best lung residence time (AUC 253 ± 18 ID/g*hrs) of all TM modalities. These observations have implications not only for the delivery of TM, but also potentially all therapeutics targeted to the endothelial surface.
靶向递送至内皮细胞具有在血液-组织界面产生局部治疗效果的潜力。对于某些治疗性货物,与血液保持接触以发挥保护作用至关重要。尽管这种策略具有明显的转化意义,但内皮表面靶向亲和配体和生物治疗货物的药代动力学(PK)仍然是一个很大程度上未被探索的领域。为了弥补这一空白,我们特异性地放射性标记了针对内皮细胞黏附分子 PECAM-1(CD31)和 ICAM-1(CD54)的单(scFv)和双价(mAb)亲和配体。放射性示踪显示,在注射后 30 分钟时,肺部的生物分布相似(αICAM 为 79.3%±4.2% vs 80.4%±10.6% ID/g,αPECAM mAb 为 58.9%±3.6% ID/g vs 47.7%±5.8% ID/g),但器官停留时间存在显著差异,抗体显示出数量级更大的肺浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC 1698±352 vs 53.3±7.9 ID/ghrs 对于 αICAM,1023±507 vs 114±37 ID/ghrs 对于 αPECAM mAb 与 scFv)。一个基于生理学的药代动力学模型,使用这些数据进行拟合和验证,表明这是由于结合特性的优越性和循环时间的延长,从而支持多次结合-脱附循环。我们使用一对一的蛋白质缀合物测试了每种亲和配体传递原型表面货物血栓调节蛋白(TM)的能力。与单价 scFv-TM 相比,双价 mAb-TM 在肺靶向和肺停留时间方面都更具优势(对于 ICAM,AUC 141±3.2 vs 12.4±4.2 ID/ghrs,对于 PECAM,AUC 188±90 vs 34.7±19.9 ID/ghrs),尽管它们具有相似的血液 PK,这表明结合强度是比结合动力学更重要的参数。为了最大限度地提高双价靶标结合,我们合成了一种定向的、端到端的抗 ICAM mAb-TM 缀合物,发现这种治疗方法具有所有 TM 方式中最长的肺停留时间(AUC 253±18 ID/g*hrs)。这些观察结果不仅对 TM 的递送具有意义,而且对靶向内皮表面的所有治疗药物也具有潜在意义。