Trauma Services, The Alfred Hospital, 89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, Level 4, 89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne 3004, VIC, Australia.
Trauma Services, The Alfred Hospital, 89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, Level 4, 89 Commercial Rd, Melbourne 3004, VIC, Australia.
Injury. 2020 Oct;51(10):2129-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.054. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
Despite multiple interventions, mortality due to severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) within mature Trauma Systems has remained unchanged over the last decade. During this time, the use of vasoactive infusions (commonly norepinephrine) to achieve a target blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) has been a mainstay of sTBI management. However, evidence suggests that norepinephrine, whilst raising blood pressure, may reduce cerebral oxygenation. This study aimed to review the available evidence that links norepinephrine augmented CPP to clinical outcomes for these patients.
A systematic review examining the evidence for norepinephrine augmented CPP in TBI patients was undertaken. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed for a dedicated literature search of multiple scientific databases. Two dedicated reviewers screened articles, whilst a third dedicated reviewer resolved conflicts.
The systematic review yielded 4,809 articles, of which 1,197 duplicate articles were removed. After abstract/title screening, 45 articles underwent full text review, resulting in the identification of two articles that investigated the effect of norepinephrine administration on clinical outcomes in patients following TBI when compared to other vasopressors. Neither study found a difference in neurological outcome between the vasopressor groups. No articles measured the effect of norepinephrine compared to no vasopressor use on the clinical outcome of patients with sTBI.
Despite being a mainstay of pharmacological management for hypotension in patients following sTBI, there is minimal clinical evidence supporting the use of norepinephrine in targeting a CPP for either improving neurological outcomes or reducing mortality. Outcomes-based clinical trials exploring the role of brain tissue perfusion and oxygenation monitoring are required to validate any benefit.
尽管采取了多种干预措施,但在成熟创伤系统中,严重创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)导致的死亡率在过去十年中并未改变。在此期间,使用血管活性输注(通常为去甲肾上腺素)来实现目标血压和脑灌注压(CPP)一直是 sTBI 管理的主要方法。然而,有证据表明,去甲肾上腺素虽然可以升高血压,但可能会降低脑氧合。本研究旨在回顾现有的证据,这些证据将去甲肾上腺素增强的 CPP 与这些患者的临床结果联系起来。
对评估去甲肾上腺素增强 TBI 患者 CPP 的证据进行了系统评价。为专门的文献检索开发了严格的纳入和排除标准,涉及多个科学数据库。两名专门的审查员筛选文章,而第三名专门的审查员解决冲突。
系统评价产生了 4809 篇文章,其中 1197 篇重复文章被删除。在进行摘要/标题筛选后,有 45 篇文章进行了全文审查,确定了两篇研究去甲肾上腺素对 TBI 患者接受其他血管加压药治疗后临床结果的影响的文章。这两项研究均未发现血管加压剂组之间神经功能结局存在差异。没有文章测量去甲肾上腺素与不使用血管加压药对 sTBI 患者临床结果的影响。
尽管去甲肾上腺素是治疗 sTBI 后低血压患者的药物治疗的主要方法,但几乎没有临床证据支持使用去甲肾上腺素来靶向 CPP 以改善神经功能结局或降低死亡率。需要进行基于结果的临床试验,以探索脑血流和氧合监测的作用,从而验证任何益处。