Lenoir Marien, Emmott Alexander, Bouhout Ismail, Poirier Nancy, Tousch Michaël, El-Hamamsy Ismail, Mongeon François-Pierre
Department of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;163(2):578-587.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.185. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
Studies suggest that patients undergoing the Ross procedure for aortic insufficiency are at greater risk of autograft dilatation than those with aortic stenosis. By using a tailored Ross technique to mitigate autograft dilatation in patients with aortic insufficiency, we aimed to compare the biomechanical and morphologic remodeling of the autograft at 1 year between patients with aortic insufficiency and patients with aortic stenosis.
A total of 210 patients underwent a Ross procedure (2011-2016). Of those, 86 patients (mean age 43 ± 13 years; 32% were female) completed preoperative and postoperative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 71 studies were suitable for analysis: 41 patients with aortic stenosis and 30 patients with aortic insufficiency. Nine healthy adults were used as controls. Autograft root dimensions, individual sinus volumes, and distensibility were measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
At 1 year, there was no difference in autograft root dimensions between patients with aortic stenosis (mean annulus 25.1 ± 3.1 mm and sinus diameters 35 ± 4.1 mm) and patients with aortic insufficiency (26.6 ± 3 mm and 37.1 ± 3.5 mm; P = .12 and .06, respectively). Relative sinus of Valsalva volumes were symmetrical in the aortic stenosis (right 34.8% ± 4%, left 33.7% ± 3.5%, noncoronary 31.4% ± 3.2%) and aortic insufficiency groups (34.8% ± 3.9%, 33.8% ± 2.8%, 31.3% ± 3.7%, P = .85, .92, and .82), and similar to those of healthy adults. Aortic root distensibility was reduced in both groups compared with healthy adults (P = .003), but was similar between aortic stenosis (3.12 ± 1.58 × 10 mm Hg) and aortic insufficiency (3.04 ± 1.15 × 10 mm Hg; P = .9).
Using a tailored technique, there were no differences in the morphologic or biomechanical remodeling of the autograft root 1 year after the Ross procedure between patients with aortic stenosis and patients with aortic insufficiency. However, autograft roots are stiffer than native aortic roots.
研究表明,与患有主动脉狭窄的患者相比,接受罗斯手术治疗主动脉瓣关闭不全的患者自体移植物扩张的风险更高。通过采用定制的罗斯技术来减轻主动脉瓣关闭不全患者的自体移植物扩张,我们旨在比较主动脉瓣关闭不全患者和主动脉狭窄患者术后1年自体移植物的生物力学和形态重塑情况。
共有210例患者接受了罗斯手术(2011 - 2016年)。其中,86例患者(平均年龄43±13岁;32%为女性)完成了术前和术后心血管磁共振成像检查。共有71项研究适合分析:41例主动脉狭窄患者和30例主动脉瓣关闭不全患者。9名健康成年人作为对照。使用心血管磁共振测量自体移植物根部尺寸、单个窦容积和扩张性。
术后1年,主动脉狭窄患者(平均瓣环25.1±3.1mm,窦直径35±4.1mm)和主动脉瓣关闭不全患者(26.6±3mm和37.1±3.5mm;P分别为0.12和0.06)的自体移植物根部尺寸无差异。主动脉狭窄组(右34.8%±4%,左33.7%±3.5%,无冠31.4%±3.2%)和主动脉瓣关闭不全组(34.8%±3.9%,33.8%±2.8%,31.3%±3.7%,P分别为0.85、0.92和0.82)的相对主动脉瓣窦容积对称,且与健康成年人相似。与健康成年人相比,两组的主动脉根部扩张性均降低(P = 0.003),但主动脉狭窄组(3.12±1.58×10 mmHg)和主动脉瓣关闭不全组(3.04±1.15×10 mmHg;P = 0.9)之间相似。
采用定制技术,主动脉狭窄患者和主动脉瓣关闭不全患者在罗斯手术后1年自体移植物根部的形态或生物力学重塑无差异。然而,自体移植物根部比天然主动脉根部更硬。