Department of Neurology, People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, People's Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Dec;142(6):521-530. doi: 10.1111/ane.13325. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
The role of intravenous sodium valproate (iVPA) in acute migraine attack has not been completely established. The aim of this updated review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iVPA in patients with acute migraine in the emergency department. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was improvement of headache intensity and headache relief. The need for rescue therapy, recurrence of headache, and number of adverse events was also assessed. Seven double-blinded RCTs involving 682 patients were analyzed. Overall, patients receiving iVPA had less improvement of headache intensity (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.06, P = .02) and lower rate of headache relief (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.77, P = .002) than those receiving other active comparators. In addition, iVPA increased the odds of rescue therapy compared with other active drugs (OR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.96 to 7.20, P < .0001). Subgroup analysis showed that iVPA was comparable to dexamethasone, with similar improvement of headache intensity, and recurrence of headache. For migraine without aura, we found no significant difference in headache intensity improvement when iVPA was compared with active comparators (SMD: -0.00, 95% CI: -0.54 to 0.54, P = 1.00). iVPA was inferior to the studied comparators and was comparable to dexamethasone for aborting migraine attack. Based on the available evidence, iVPA may be a reasonable alternative or salvage therapy. In particular, iVPA might be a promising agent for migraine with aura and migraine status.
静脉注射丙戊酸钠(iVPA)在急性偏头痛发作中的作用尚未完全确定。本更新综述的目的是评估 iVPA 在急诊科急性偏头痛患者中的疗效和安全性。我们在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中搜索了相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是头痛强度的改善和头痛缓解。还评估了需要抢救治疗、头痛复发和不良事件的数量。共分析了 7 项涉及 682 名患者的双盲 RCT。总体而言,接受 iVPA 的患者头痛强度改善程度较低(SMD:-0.39,95%CI:-0.73 至-0.06,P=0.02),头痛缓解率较低(OR:0.51,95%CI:0.33 至 0.77,P=0.002),与接受其他活性对照药物的患者相比。此外,iVPA 与其他活性药物相比,增加了需要抢救治疗的几率(OR:3.76;95%CI:1.96 至 7.20,P<0.0001)。亚组分析表明,iVPA 与地塞米松相当,头痛强度改善和头痛复发情况相似。对于无先兆偏头痛,我们发现 iVPA 与活性对照药物相比,头痛强度改善无显著差异(SMD:-0.00,95%CI:-0.54 至 0.54,P=1.00)。iVPA 不如研究中的对照药物,与地塞米松相比,用于终止偏头痛发作的效果相当。基于现有证据,iVPA 可能是一种合理的替代或挽救治疗方法。特别是,iVPA 可能是有先兆偏头痛和偏头痛状态的有前途的药物。