Brewster David J, Butt Warwick W, Gordon Lisi J, Rees Charlotte E
Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020 Jul;48(4):266-276. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20937319. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
An integrative review of the literature specific to leadership within the intensive care unit was planned to guide future research. Four databases were searched. Study selection was based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and a quality check was done. Data extraction and synthesis involved developing a preliminary thematic coding framework based on a sample of papers. The coding framework and all selected papers were entered into NVivo software. All papers were then coded to the previously identified themes. Themes were summarised and presented with illustrative quotes highlighting key findings. In total, 1102 relevant quotations were coded across the 28 included papers. Four themes pertaining to leadership were described and analysed: (a) leadership dimensions and discourses; (b) leadership experiences; (c) facilitators and/or barriers to leadership; and (d) leadership outcomes. The literature was found to focus on leader behaviours, as well as the leader dimensions of role allocation, clinical and communication skills and traditional hierarchies. Positive behaviours mentioned included good decision-making, staying calm under pressure and being approachable. Leadership experiences (and outcomes) are typically reported to be positive. Personal individual factors seem the biggest enablers and barriers to leadership within the intensive care unit. Training is considered to be a facilitator of leadership within the intensive care unit. This study highlights the current literature on leadership in intensive care medicine and provides a basis for future research on interventions to improve leadership in the intensive care unit.
计划对重症监护病房内领导力相关的文献进行综合综述,以指导未来的研究。检索了四个数据库。研究选择基于预先确定的纳入和排除标准,并进行了质量检查。数据提取和综合包括基于一组论文样本制定初步的主题编码框架。编码框架和所有选定的论文都录入了NVivo软件。然后所有论文都按照先前确定的主题进行编码。对主题进行了总结,并通过突出关键发现的说明性引语进行呈现。在总共28篇纳入论文中,共编码了1102条相关引语。描述并分析了与领导力相关的四个主题:(a)领导力维度与论述;(b)领导经历;(c)领导力的促进因素和/或障碍;(d)领导成果。研究发现,文献聚焦于领导者行为,以及角色分配、临床和沟通技能及传统层级等领导力维度。提到的积极行为包括良好的决策能力、在压力下保持冷静和平易近人。领导经历(及成果)通常被报告为积极的。个人因素似乎是重症监护病房内领导力最大的促进因素和障碍。培训被认为是重症监护病房内领导力的一个促进因素。本研究突出了当前重症监护医学领域关于领导力的文献,并为未来改善重症监护病房领导力的干预措施研究提供了基础。