Suzuki Hiroto, Nakamura Masanao, Yamamura Takeshi, Maeda Keiko, Sawada Tsunaki, Mizutani Yasuyuki, Ishikawa Takuya, Furukawa Kazuhiro, Ohno Eizaburo, Honda Takashi, Kawashima Hiroki, Ishigami Masatoshi, Fujishiro Mitsuhiro
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Department of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan.
Intern Med. 2020;59(15):1795-1801. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4267-19. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
Objective With the advent of endoscopic treatment, the detailed diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms made using magnifying colonoscopy has become increasingly important. However, insertion difficulty causes pain in unsedated colonoscopy. The aim of this prospective observational study was to clarify the factors associated with a patient's pain in unsedated colonoscopy using a magnifying endoscope. Methods Patient pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (0-10) immediately after the procedure. We defined 5 as mild enough pain that patients would not be reluctant to undergo another colonoscopy. Acceptable pain was defined as 5 or less and severe pain was defined as 8 to 10. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed using the pain scale score as a dependent variable. Results A total of consecutive 600 patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopies were evaluated to assess their abdominal pain. The completion rate was 99.5% (597/600). The mean pain scale score was 3.88±2.38. The rate of acceptable pain was 80.5% (483/600). The rate of severe pain was 6.7% (40/600) including the incomplete cases. A comparison of polyp-positive and polyp-negative cases revealed no marked difference in patient pain (3.82±2.24 vs. 3.94±2.49, respectively; p=0.590) or insertion time (6.62±3.98 vs. 6.29±4.21, p=0.090), while more observation time was needed in polyp-positive cases than in polyp-negative ones (16.30±4.95 vs. 13.08±4.69, p<0.01). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that an older age, colectomy, antispasmodic agent use, and a small-diameter endoscope were significant factors associated with less patient pain. In particular, a small-diameter endoscope induces significantly more acceptable pain than a non-small diameter endoscope [85.63% (274/320) vs. 73.93% (207/280), p=0.00003]. Conclusion Unsedated colonoscopy using a magnifying endoscope by an expert may result in acceptable pain levels. The use of an antispasmodic agent, particularly hyoscine N-butyl bromide, and a small-diameter endoscope are recommended for reducing abdominal pain during unsedated colonoscopy.
目的 随着内镜治疗的出现,使用放大结肠镜对结直肠肿瘤进行详细诊断变得越来越重要。然而,在未使用镇静剂的结肠镜检查中,插入困难会引起疼痛。这项前瞻性观察性研究的目的是明确在未使用镇静剂的放大内镜结肠镜检查中与患者疼痛相关的因素。方法 在检查结束后立即使用数字评分量表(0 - 10)评估患者的疼痛程度。我们将5定义为疼痛程度较轻,患者不会不愿接受再次结肠镜检查。可接受的疼痛定义为5分及以下,严重疼痛定义为8至10分。以疼痛量表评分作为因变量进行单因素和多因素线性回归分析。结果 总共对连续600例接受未使用镇静剂结肠镜检查的患者进行评估以评估其腹痛情况。完成率为99.5%(597/600)。平均疼痛量表评分为3.88±2.38。可接受疼痛的发生率为80.5%(483/600)。严重疼痛的发生率为6.7%(40/600),包括未完成检查的病例。息肉阳性和息肉阴性病例的比较显示,患者疼痛(分别为3.82±2.24和3.94±2.49;p = 0.590)或插入时间(分别为6.62±3.98和6.29±4.21,p = 0.090)无明显差异,而息肉阳性病例比息肉阴性病例需要更多的观察时间(分别为16.30±4.95和13.08±4.69,p<0.01)。单因素和多因素线性回归分析显示,年龄较大、结肠切除术、使用解痉剂以及小直径内镜是与患者疼痛较轻相关的显著因素。特别是,小直径内镜比非小直径内镜引起的可接受疼痛明显更多[85.63%(274/320)对73.93%(207/280),p = 0.00003]。结论 由专家进行的未使用镇静剂的放大内镜结肠镜检查可能会使疼痛程度可接受。建议使用解痉剂,尤其是丁溴东莨菪碱,以及小直径内镜以减轻未使用镇静剂的结肠镜检查期间的腹痛。