Avery Lisa, Hoffmann Charles, Whalen Karen M
St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY, USA.
St. Joseph's Health, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2020 Aug;55(4):224-235. doi: 10.1177/0018578719836646. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a concern in immunocompromised patients. Aerosolized ribavirin (RBV AER) is used for treatment of RSV LRTI; however, adverse events and rising drug costs remain a challenge for patient management. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the efficacy and adverse event profile of RBV AER for the treatment of hospitalized RSV LRTI in immunocompromised adult patients. A Medline/PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library database search was conducted from 1966 to January 2019 for the use of RBV AER. Search strategy: [(ribavirin OR ICN1229) AND ("administration, oral" OR "oral" OR "administration, inhalation" OR "inhalation)] AND ("respiratory tract infection" OR "pneumonia"). Studies were reviewed if adult patients were hospitalized, immunocompromised, had RSV LRTI, received RBV AER, and included the outcome of mortality and/or adverse reactions. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration GRADE approach. A total of 1787 records were identified and 15 articles met inclusion criteria: hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)/bone marrow transplant (n = 8), other malignancy/neutropenic (n = 2), solid organ transplant (n = 5). All of the trials are observational with a low quality rating; therefore, a meta-analysis was not performed. The 30-day mortality in studies that contain >10 patients with HSCT, malignancy, and transplant range from 0 to 15.4%, 6.3%, and 0 to 27%, respectively. Improved mortality was cited in 4 studies when RBV AER started before mechanical ventilation or within 2 weeks of symptom onset. Only 3 studies had comparative mortality data with RBV AER and RBV PO. Adverse reactions were reported in 5 studies and included psychiatric manifestations (anxiety, depression, feeling of isolation; n = 14), wheezing/bronchospasm (n = 6), snowflakes/hail blowing in face (n = 6), and precipitation in ventilator tubing (n = 5). There is a lack of high quality, comparative trials on the use of RBV AER for the treatment of RSV LRTI in adult hospitalized immunocompromised patients. There may be a mortality benefit when RBV AER is initiated early after diagnosis or prior to mechanical ventilation, but requires further study. Patient isolation and psychological effects must be weighed against the benefit of therapy.
呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)相关的下呼吸道感染(LRTI)是免疫功能低下患者需要关注的问题。雾化利巴韦林(RBV AER)用于治疗RSV LRTI;然而,不良事件和不断上涨的药物成本仍然是患者管理面临的挑战。本系统评价的目的是总结RBV AER治疗免疫功能低下成年住院患者RSV LRTI的疗效和不良事件情况。对1966年至2019年1月期间使用RBV AER的情况进行了Medline/PubMed、Embase、谷歌学术、Clinicaltrials.gov和Cochrane图书馆数据库检索。检索策略:[(利巴韦林或ICN1229) AND ("给药,口服" 或 "口服" 或 "给药,吸入" 或 "吸入")] AND ("呼吸道感染" 或 "肺炎")。如果成年患者住院、免疫功能低下、患有RSV LRTI、接受RBV AER治疗且纳入了死亡率和/或不良反应的结果,则对研究进行综述。使用Cochrane协作组的GRADE方法评估方法学质量。共识别出1787条记录,15篇文章符合纳入标准:造血干细胞移植(HSCT)/骨髓移植(n = 8)、其他恶性肿瘤/中性粒细胞减少(n = 2)、实体器官移植(n = 5)。所有试验均为观察性研究,质量评级较低;因此,未进行荟萃分析。在包含>10例HSCT、恶性肿瘤和移植患者的研究中,30天死亡率分别为0%至15.4%、6.3%和0%至27%。4项研究表明,在机械通气前或症状出现后2周内开始使用RBV AER可提高生存率。只有3项研究有RBV AER与口服利巴韦林(RBV PO)的比较死亡率数据。5项研究报告了不良反应,包括精神表现(焦虑、抑郁、孤独感;n = 14)、喘息/支气管痉挛(n = 6)、雪花/冰雹扑面感(n = 6)和呼吸机管道内有沉淀(n = 5)。缺乏关于RBV AER治疗成年住院免疫功能低下患者RSV LRTI的高质量比较试验。在诊断后早期或机械通气前开始使用RBV AER可能有生存获益,但需要进一步研究。必须权衡患者隔离和心理影响与治疗获益。