Wang Xi, Mei Xuecan, Kong Derun
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Fuyang Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, Anhui 236000, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Aug;20(2):1299-1306. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8876. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
In the present study, the effects of diabetes on rebleeding following endoscopic treatment were assessed in patients with liver cirrhosis. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Hefei, China) between June 2015 and March 2018 was performed. The patients were divided into the EVL and the EIS groups and each group was subdivided into diabetic and non-diabetic groups. The post-operative rebleeding rate was compared between the EVL and the EIS groups and between the diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The differences in the post-operative rebleeding rate of diabetic patients with hepatogenic and non-hepatogenic diabetes and in patients with different liver function grades were also determined. In the total patient cohort, the rebleeding rate in the EVL subgroup (11.3, 16.5 and 23.5%) was not significantly different compared with that in the EIS subgroup (9.8, 17.4 and 29.3%) at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery, respectively (P=0.724, 0.868 and 0.339). In the total diabetic group, the rebleeding rate in the EVL subgroup (25.0, 36.1 and 44.4%) was not significantly different compared with that in the EIS subgroup (20.6, 32.4 and 47.1%) at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery (P=0.660, 0.741 and 0.826, respectively). In the EVL group, the rebleeding rate in the diabetic subgroup (25.0, 36.1 and 44.4%) was higher than that in the non-diabetic subgroup (5.1, 7.6 and 13.9%) at 1, 3, and 6 months following surgery and the differences were significant (P=0.005, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). In the EIS group, the rebleeding rate in the diabetic subgroup (20.6, 32.4 and 47.1%) was significantly higher than that in the non-diabetic subgroup (3.4, 8.6 and 19.0%) at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery (P=0.021, 0.004 and 0.004, respectively). Adjustment for age and liver function grade in the EVL and EIS groups was performed using binary logistic regression and the parameter diabetes was indicated to be a risk factor for post-operative rebleeding (P<0.05). No significant difference was noted in the rate of rebleeding between patients with hepatogenic diabetes and non-hepatogenic diabetes at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery (P=0.634, 0.726 and 0.446, respectively). In the total diabetic group, the rebleeding rate in the Child-Pugh grade A subgroup (14.3, 17.9 and 25.0%) was lower than that in the Child-Pugh grade B/C subgroup (28.6, 45.2 and 59.5%) at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery, respectively. No significant difference was noted between the two groups at 1 month following surgery (P=0.163). However, the differences were significant at 3 and 6 months following surgery (P=0.018 and 0.005, respectively). The results suggested that diabetes is a risk factor for post-operative rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Diabetic patients with poor liver function were more likely to bleed following surgery and the post-operative bleeding rate was not significantly different between patients with hepatogenic and non-hepatogenic diabetes. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR1800017772).
在本研究中,评估了糖尿病对肝硬化患者内镜治疗后再出血的影响。对2015年6月至2018年3月期间在安徽医科大学第一附属医院(中国合肥)接受内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)或内镜注射硬化治疗(EIS)的患者进行了回顾性分析。将患者分为EVL组和EIS组,每组再细分为糖尿病组和非糖尿病组。比较了EVL组和EIS组之间以及糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者之间的术后再出血率。还确定了肝源性糖尿病和非肝源性糖尿病的糖尿病患者以及不同肝功能分级患者术后再出血率的差异。在整个患者队列中,术后1、3和6个月时,EVL亚组的再出血率(分别为11.3%、16.5%和23.5%)与EIS亚组(分别为9.8%、17.4%和29.3%)相比无显著差异(P = 0.724、0.868和0.339)。在整个糖尿病组中,术后1、3和6个月时,EVL亚组的再出血率(分别为25.0%、36.1%和44.4%)与EIS亚组(分别为20.6%、32.4%和47.1%)相比无显著差异(P分别为0.660、0.741和0.826)。在EVL组中,术后1、3和6个月时,糖尿病亚组的再出血率(分别为25.0%、36.1%和44.4%)高于非糖尿病亚组(分别为5.1%、7.6%和13.9%),差异有统计学意义(P分别为0.005、<0.001和<0.001)。在EIS组中,术后1、3和6个月时,糖尿病亚组的再出血率(分别为20.6%、32.4%和47.1%)显著高于非糖尿病亚组(分别为3.4%、8.6%和19.0%)(P分别为0.021、0.004和0.004)。使用二元逻辑回归对EVL组和EIS组的年龄和肝功能分级进行调整,结果表明糖尿病参数是术后再出血的危险因素(P<0.05)。术后1、3和6个月时,肝源性糖尿病患者和非肝源性糖尿病患者之间的再出血率无显著差异(P分别为0.634、0.726和0.446)。在整个糖尿病组中,术后1、3和6个月时,Child-Pugh A级亚组的再出血率(分别为14.3%、17.9%和25.