Suppr超能文献

使用外固定器时踝关节融合术的新分类

A New Classification for Ankle Arthrodesis When Using an External Fixator.

作者信息

Matsubara Hidenori, Watanabe Koji, Takata Munetomo, Nomura Issei, Tsuchiya Hiroyuki

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Japan.

出版信息

Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2019 Sep-Dec;14(3):148-154. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1436.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We have classified ankle arthrodesis when using an external fixator into four types based on the deformity and defect. Each of the four types of technique have been evaluated retrospectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three lower limb segments in 30 patients (average age 49 years) were treated by ankle arthrodesis using an external fixator in our institution. We classified the pre-treatment problems into four types and adjusted the surgical treatment accordingly: type I-no bone defect, no or mild deformity; type II-no bone defect, severe deformity; type III-bone defect with the possibility to shorten acutely after resection of the pathological focus; and type IV-bone defect but without the ability to shorten acutely after resection of the pathological focus. Type I problems were treated with curettage of ankle cartilage and bone graft with external fixation. Type II problems were treated with mobilisation using an external fixation after performing a type I ankle arthrodesis. Type III problems were treated with ankle arthrodesis using acute shortening and distraction. Type IV problems were treated with ankle arthrodesis using bone transport.

RESULTS

All patients had secure ankle fusion and were able to bear total weight in walking on completion of treatment. The mean external fixation period was 96 days in type I, 181 days in type II, 231 days with lengthening in type III and IV. The complications included re-fracture in three cases, deformity at the lengthening site in one, delayed union in one, and infection at fusion site in one.

CONCLUSION

We have strategized ankle arthrodesis procedures using an external fixator into four groups in order to align the surgical technique with the pre-treatment problem. Our classification can help decide the appropriate operative method when using an external fixator, especially for difficult cases.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Matsubara H, Watanabe K, Takata M, A New Classification for Ankle Arthrodesis When Using an External Fixator. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(3):148-154.

摘要

背景

我们根据畸形和缺损情况将使用外固定器的踝关节融合术分为四种类型。已对这四种技术类型分别进行了回顾性评估。

材料与方法

在我们机构中,30例患者(平均年龄49岁)的33个下肢节段接受了使用外固定器的踝关节融合术治疗。我们将术前问题分为四种类型,并据此调整手术治疗方案:I型 - 无骨缺损,无或轻度畸形;II型 - 无骨缺损,严重畸形;III型 - 存在骨缺损,切除病灶后有可能急性短缩;IV型 - 存在骨缺损,但切除病灶后无法急性短缩。I型问题采用踝关节软骨刮除及外固定植骨治疗。II型问题在进行I型踝关节融合术后采用外固定器活动治疗。III型问题采用急性短缩和牵张的踝关节融合术治疗。IV型问题采用骨搬运的踝关节融合术治疗。

结果

所有患者均实现了牢固的踝关节融合,治疗完成后能够完全负重行走。I型的平均外固定时间为96天,II型为181天,III型和IV型延长后的外固定时间为231天。并发症包括3例再骨折、1例延长部位畸形、1例延迟愈合和1例融合部位感染。

结论

我们将使用外固定器的踝关节融合术程序分为四组,以便使手术技术与术前问题相匹配。我们的分类有助于在使用外固定器时,尤其是针对疑难病例,确定合适的手术方法。

如何引用本文

松原H,渡边K,高田M,《使用外固定器时踝关节融合术的新分类》。《创伤肢体重建策略》2019;14(3):148 - 154。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43cc/7368357/44085566e62a/stlr-14-148-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验