Foot & Ankle Unit, Al-Razi Orthopaedic Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Purulent Osteology Clinic, Bone Infection Department No. 2, Russian Ilizarov Scientific Centre for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, Russia.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):470-477. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-1158.R1.
Infected and deformed neuropathic feet and ankles are serious challenges for surgical management. In this study we present our experience in performing ankle arthrodesis in a closed manner, without surgical preparation of the joint surfaces by cartilaginous debridement, but instead using an Ilizarov ring fixator (IRF) for deformity correction and facilitating fusion, in arthritic neuropathic ankles with associated osteomyelitis.
We retrospectively reviewed all the patients who underwent closed ankle arthrodesis (CAA) in Ilizarov Scientific Centre from 2013 to 2018 (Group A) and compared them with a similar group of patients (Group B) who underwent open ankle arthrodesis (OAA). We then divided the neuropathic patients into three arthritic subgroups: Charcot joint, Charcot-Maire-Tooth disease, and post-traumatic arthritis. All arthrodeses were performed by using an Ilizarov ring fixator. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically for a minimum of 12 months to assess union and function.
The union rate for Group A was 81% (17/21) while it was 84.6% (33/39) for Group B. All the nonunions in Group A underwent revision with an open technique and achieved 100% union. Mean duration of IRF was 71.5 days (59 to 82) in Group A and 69 days (64.8 to 77.7) in Group B. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was similar in both groups. The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in Group A (21 days (SD 8)) than Group B (28 days (SD 9)). In the latter Group there were more problems with wound healing and greater requirement for antibiotic treatment. The mean operating time was 40 minutes (SD 9) in Group A compared to 80 minutes (SD 13) in Group B. Recurrence of infection occurred in 19% (4/21) and 15.5% (6/39) for Group A and Group B respectively.
We found CAA using an IRF to be an effective method for ankle arthrodesis in infected neuropathic foot and ankle cases and afforded comparable results to open methods. Due to its great advantages, Ilizarov method of CAA should always be considered for neuropathic ankles in suitable patients. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(4):470-477.
感染和畸形的神经病变足和踝关节是手术治疗的严重挑战。在这项研究中,我们介绍了在关节炎性神经病变踝关节伴骨髓炎的情况下,使用环形伊利扎洛夫(Ilizarov)固定器(IRF)进行畸形矫正和促进融合,而不通过软骨清创术来准备关节表面,从而以闭合方式进行踝关节融合术的经验。
我们回顾性分析了 2013 年至 2018 年在伊利扎洛夫科学中心接受闭合踝关节融合术(CAA)的所有患者(A 组),并将其与接受开放式踝关节融合术(OAA)的类似患者(B 组)进行比较。然后,我们将神经病变患者分为三个关节炎亚组:夏科关节、夏科-迈尔-图特病和创伤后关节炎。所有的融合术均使用伊利扎洛夫环形固定器进行。所有患者均接受至少 12 个月的临床和放射学随访,以评估融合和功能。
A 组的融合率为 81%(17/21),B 组为 84.6%(33/39)。A 组的所有不愈合患者均采用开放式技术进行翻修,均达到 100%愈合。A 组 IRF 的平均使用时间为 71.5 天(59 至 82),B 组为 69 天(64.8 至 77.7)。两组的美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分相似。A 组的术后住院时间为 21 天(标准差 8),短于 B 组的 28 天(标准差 9)。B 组中,伤口愈合问题较多,需要抗生素治疗的比例也较高。A 组的平均手术时间为 40 分钟(标准差 9),B 组为 80 分钟(标准差 13)。A 组和 B 组的感染复发率分别为 19%(4/21)和 15.5%(6/39)。
我们发现使用环形伊利扎洛夫固定器进行 CAA 是治疗感染性神经病变足踝关节的一种有效方法,其结果与开放式方法相当。由于其巨大优势,伊利扎洛夫法 CAA 应始终被视为适合患者的神经病变踝关节的治疗方法。
引用:2020;102-B(4):470-477.