Suppr超能文献

自身抗体检测在直接免疫荧光阴性黏膜性类天疱疮诊断中的应用:眼及其它部位的比较。

Autoantibody Detection for Diagnosis in Direct Immunofluorescence-Negative Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: Ocular and Other Sites Compared.

机构信息

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.

Guy's and St. Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2021 Mar;128(3):372-382. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.052. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess whether a panel of serum pemphigoid autoantibody tests could be used to confirm an immunopathologic diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) in direct immunofluorescent negative (DIF-) MMP patients.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-six patients with multisite MMP with 45 matched control participants.

METHODS

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for BP180 and BP230 (MBL International), immunoglobulin A (IgA) A and immunoglobulin G indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on human salt-split skin and the keratinocyte footprint assay for anti-laminin 332 antibodies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity and specificity of autoantibody detection and significant differences for individual tests and test combinations for MMP involving different sites.

RESULTS

All DIF- patients (24/73 [31.8%]) had either ocular-only disease or ocular involvement in multisite disease. Serum pemphigoid autoantibodies were detected in 29 of 76 MMP patients (38.2%) compared with 3 of 45 control participants (6.7%). Autoantibody reactivity detected by any 1 or more of the tests was present in 6 of 24 DIF- patients (25%) compared with 22 of 49 DIF positive (DIF+) patients (44.9%). Ocular-only MMP serum reactivity was not significantly different for any test or test combination compared with control participants, whereas DIF- multisite ocular MMP differed for 1 ELISA and 3 of 7 test combinations. By contrast, for DIF+ nonocular MMP patients, all the individual tests, apart from IgA IIF, and all test combinations were significantly different compared with those for control participants. For the entire MMP cohort, the sensitivity of all individual tests was low, having a maximum of 21.05% for BP180 reactivity but increasing to 38.16% for an optimal test combination. Disease activity was associated strongly with positive serologic findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemphigoid serum autoantibody tests did not provide immunopathologic evidence of MMP in ocular-only MMP patients but showed limited value in DIF- multisite ocular MMP patients. The requirement for immunopathologic confirmation of MMP by autoantibody detection is inappropriate for DIF- ocular-only MMP patients, resulting in missed diagnoses, delayed therapy, and poor outcomes. Alternative diagnostic criteria for ocular-only MMP are required to exclude the other causes of scarring conjunctivitis until more sensitive and specific immunopathologic tests become available.

摘要

目的

评估一组血清天疱疮自身抗体检测是否可用于确认直接免疫荧光阴性(DIF-)黏膜性天疱疮(MMP)患者的免疫病理学诊断。

设计

前瞻性病例对照研究。

参与者

76 例多部位 MMP 患者和 45 例匹配的对照参与者。

方法

酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测 BP180 和 BP230(MBL 国际)、免疫球蛋白 A(IgA)和人盐裂皮肤间接免疫荧光(IIF)以及抗层粘连蛋白 332 抗体的角质形成细胞足迹试验。

主要观察指标

自身抗体检测的敏感性和特异性,以及不同部位 MMP 患者中各检测和检测组合的差异。

结果

所有 DIF-患者(24/73 [31.8%])均为眼表疾病或多部位疾病中存在眼表受累。与 45 名对照参与者中的 3 名(6.7%)相比,76 例 MMP 患者中有 29 例(38.2%)检测到血清天疱疮自身抗体。用 1 种或多种检测方法检测到的自身抗体反应在 24 例 DIF-患者中存在 6 例(25%),而在 49 例 DIF 阳性(DIF+)患者中存在 22 例(44.9%)。与对照参与者相比,任何检测或检测组合的眼表 MMP 患者血清反应均无显著差异,而 DIF-多部位眼表 MMP 患者的 1 种 ELISA 和 3 种检测组合则不同。相比之下,对于 DIF+非眼表 MMP 患者,除 IgA IIF 外,所有的单项检测以及所有的检测组合均与对照参与者有显著差异。对于整个 MMP 队列,所有单项检测的敏感性均较低,BP180 反应的最高值为 21.05%,但最佳检测组合的敏感性增至 38.16%。疾病活动度与血清学阳性结果密切相关。

结论

在仅有眼部表现的 MMP 患者中,天疱疮血清自身抗体检测未提供 MMP 的免疫病理学证据,但在 DIF-多部位眼部 MMP 患者中具有一定的价值。对于 DIF-眼表仅有 MMP 患者,通过自身抗体检测进行 MMP 的免疫病理学确认是不合适的,这会导致漏诊、延迟治疗和预后不良。需要替代的仅有眼部表现的 MMP 诊断标准,以排除其他导致瘢痕性结膜炎的原因,直到更敏感和特异的免疫病理学检测方法出现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验