• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴囊 vs. 外侧 vs. 内侧腹股沟疝的结局差异:注册数据的多变量分析。

Differences in the outcomes of scrotal vs. lateral vs. medial inguinal hernias: a multivariable analysis of registry data.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching, Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Ernst Von Bergmann Hospital, Charlottenstrasse 72, 14467, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1169-1181. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02281-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02281-9
PMID:32748006
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are hardly any studies on the outcome of scrotal compared with medial and lateral inguinal hernias. Therefore, this present multivariable analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry compared the outcome of scrotal vs. lateral vs. medial inguinal hernias and explored the relationship between hernia localization and outcomes.

METHODS

Included in the analysis were all primary elective unilateral inguinal hernias in men with scrotal, lateral or medial defect localization whose details had been entered into the Herniamed Registry by 712 participating institutions (status February 1, 2019). The relation of the hernia localization with the outcome parameters adjusted for pre-defined confounding patient- and procedure-related variables was analyzed via multivariable binary logistic models.

RESULTS

Details of 98,321 patients were thus available for multivariable analysis. These related to 65,932 (67.1%) lateral, 29,697 (30.2%) medial and 2,710 (2.7%) scrotal inguinal hernias. Scrotal hernias were associated with higher patient age, higher BMI, higher ASA score, larger defect, more risk factors and more frequent use of Lichtenstein repair. On the other hand, scrotal hernias were associated less commonly with preoperative pain. Multivariable analysis revealed that scrotal hernias had a highly significantly unfavorable association with postoperative complications, complication-related reoperations and general complications. But scrotal hernias had a highly significantly favorable relation with the pain rates at 1-year follow-up. Medial hernias were the hernia type most often related with recurrence and also had an unfavorable association with the pain rates at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Scrotal inguinal hernias demonstrated a very unfavorable relation with the postoperative complication rate, the rate of complication-related reoperations and the rate of general complications. But a very favorable association with chronic pain rates was identified at 1-year follow-up. Medial inguinal hernia had an unfavorable relation with the recurrence and pain rates.

摘要

引言

几乎没有任何研究比较阴囊疝与内侧和外侧腹股沟疝的结果。因此,本研究通过对 Herniamed 注册中心的数据进行多变量分析,比较了阴囊疝与外侧疝和内侧疝的结果,并探讨了疝定位与结果之间的关系。

方法

本分析纳入了所有男性原发性单侧择期腹股沟疝,疝缺损部位为阴囊、外侧或内侧,712 家参与机构已将其详细信息录入 Herniamed 注册中心(截至 2019 年 2 月 1 日的状态)。通过多变量二项逻辑模型,分析疝定位与调整了预定义混杂患者和手术相关变量的结果参数之间的关系。

结果

因此,共有 98321 例患者的详细资料可用于多变量分析。这些患者中,65932 例(67.1%)为外侧疝,29697 例(30.2%)为内侧疝,2710 例(2.7%)为阴囊疝。阴囊疝与患者年龄较大、BMI 较高、ASA 评分较高、疝缺损较大、更多危险因素和更频繁使用 Lichtenstein 修补术有关。另一方面,阴囊疝与术前疼痛较少相关。多变量分析显示,阴囊疝与术后并发症、与并发症相关的再次手术和一般并发症具有高度显著的不利关联。但是,阴囊疝与 1 年随访时的疼痛发生率具有高度显著的有利关系。内侧疝是最常与复发相关的疝类型,与 1 年随访时的疼痛发生率也存在不利关联。

结论

阴囊疝与术后并发症发生率、与并发症相关的再次手术率和一般并发症发生率呈非常不利的关系。但是,在 1 年随访时,与慢性疼痛发生率存在非常有利的关联。内侧疝与复发和疼痛发生率呈不利关系。

相似文献

1
Differences in the outcomes of scrotal vs. lateral vs. medial inguinal hernias: a multivariable analysis of registry data.阴囊 vs. 外侧 vs. 内侧腹股沟疝的结局差异:注册数据的多变量分析。
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1169-1181. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02281-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
2
Open Repair of Primary Versus Recurrent Male Unilateral Inguinal Hernias: Perioperative Complications and 1-Year Follow-up.原发性与复发性男性单侧腹股沟疝的开放修补术:围手术期并发症及1年随访
World J Surg. 2016 Apr;40(4):813-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3325-9.
3
Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with inguinal hernia.比较常规行政数据和登记数据,以评估腹股沟疝患者的医院护理质量。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):143-151. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02009-4. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
Smaller Inguinal Hernias are Independent Risk Factors for Developing Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain (CPIP): A Registry-based Multivariable Analysis of 57, 999 Patients.小的腹股沟疝是慢性术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)发展的独立危险因素:基于登记的 57999 例患者的多变量分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Apr;271(4):756-764. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003065.
5
Assessment of potential influencing factors on the outcome in small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernia repair: a registry-based multivariable analysis of 31,965 patients.评估小(<2 厘米)脐疝修补术结局的潜在影响因素:基于登记的 31965 例患者的多变量分析。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):587-603. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02305-4. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
6
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.对来自Herniamed注册中心的4015例复发性切口疝修补术的分析:危险因素和结果。
Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):61-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Is the age of >65 years a risk factor for endoscopic treatment of primary inguinal hernia? Analysis of 24,571 patients from the Herniamed Registry.65岁以上的年龄是原发性腹股沟疝内镜治疗的危险因素吗?对来自Herniamed注册中心的24571例患者的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):296-306. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4209-7. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Influencing Factors on the Outcome in Female Groin Hernia Repair: A Registry-based Multivariable Analysis of 15,601 Patients.女性腹股沟疝修补术结局的影响因素:基于注册的 15601 例患者的多变量分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003271.
9
A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.改良腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)是腹股沟疝和股疝的标准手术:一项对1123例疝修补术的17年回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3208-9. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10
TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?全腹膜外修补术与李金斯坦修补术:哪种技术更适合男性原发性单侧腹股沟疝的修补?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3304-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4603-1. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Arm Registry-Based Comparison of Trans-Inguinal-Pre-Peritoneal, Laparoscopic, and Lichtenstein Techniques for Scrotal Hernia Repair.基于三项登记研究的经腹股沟腹膜前修补术、腹腔镜修补术和李金斯坦修补术治疗阴囊疝的比较
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jul 29;4:13993. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.13993. eCollection 2025.
2
Is the annual hospital volume associated with recurrence and chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) syndrome after inguinal hernia repair in laparo-endoscopic or open mesh technique (Lichtenstein)?腹腔镜或开放网片技术(利chtenstein术式)行腹股沟疝修补术后,每年的医院手术量是否与复发及慢性术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)综合征相关?
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2882-2901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11619-2. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical risk factors for recurrence in inguinal hernia repair - a review of the literature.腹股沟疝修补术中复发的手术危险因素——文献综述
Innov Surg Sci. 2017 Apr 13;2(2):53-59. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0013. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair - a systematic review.腹股沟疝修补术围手术期并发症的危险因素——一项系统评价
Innov Surg Sci. 2017 Feb 25;2(2):47-52. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0008. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
Comparison of enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal technique and totally extraperitoneal technique in S1 scrotal hernia repair.
S1型阴囊疝修补术中改良完全腹膜外技术与完全腹膜外技术的比较
Turk J Surg. 2025 May 30;41(2):147-153. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6669. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Are "European" Scrotal Hernias Repairable With the Minimal Open Pre-Peritoneal Technique?“欧洲型”阴囊疝能用最小切口腹膜前技术修复吗?
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Feb 20;4:13863. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.13863. eCollection 2025.
5
Large Symptomatic Inguinoscrotal Seroma Occurred Early after Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair (TEP): a Case Report and Literature Review.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)后早期出现的大型有症状腹股沟阴囊血清肿:一例报告及文献复习
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Mar;19(1):195-200. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.1.195.
6
To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study.结论:闭合、不闭合还是更大胆?在腹腔镜 TAPP 修补术中处理大型直接腹股沟疝缺损以降低复发风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2024 Oct;76(6):2395-2402. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y. Epub 2024 May 11.
7
Open vs. robot-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Are they truly clinically different?开放式与机器人辅助腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术。它们在临床上真的有区别吗?
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03050-8. Epub 2024 May 4.
8
Systematic Review and Guidelines for Management of Scrotal Inguinal Hernias.阴囊腹股沟疝管理的系统评价与指南
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023 Mar 27;2:11195. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.11195. eCollection 2023.
9
Technical aspects of inguino scrotal hernia surgery in developing countries.发展中国家腹股沟阴囊疝手术的技术方面。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):173-179. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02695-7. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
Association of Mesh and Fixation Options with Reoperation Risk after Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Surgery: A Swedish Hernia Registry Study of 25,190 Totally Extraperitoneal and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repairs.瑞典疝登记研究:全腹膜外和经腹腹膜前修补术 25190 例腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术后网片和固定方式与再次手术风险的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Mar 1;234(3):311-325. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000060.
腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术复发的原因。
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):975-986. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1817-x. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
4
Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project.疝登记系统的比较:CORE项目
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):561-575. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1724-6. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
5
Factors associated with hernia recurrence after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: a 2-year prospective cohort study.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝后疝复发的相关因素:一项为期2年的前瞻性队列研究。
Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):729-735. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1634-7. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Open Repair of Primary Versus Recurrent Male Unilateral Inguinal Hernias: Perioperative Complications and 1-Year Follow-up.原发性与复发性男性单侧腹股沟疝的开放修补术:围手术期并发症及1年随访
World J Surg. 2016 Apr;40(4):813-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3325-9.
7
Endoscopic repair of primary versus recurrent male unilateral inguinal hernias: Are there differences in the outcome?原发性与复发性男性单侧腹股沟疝的内镜修复:结果是否存在差异?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1146-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4318-3. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society).腹股沟疝腹腔镜(TAPP)和内镜(TEP)治疗指南更新(国际内镜疝学会)
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):289-321. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
9
The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery.腹股沟疝修补术后复发的流行病学及危险因素
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4846.
10
Recurrence patterns of direct and indirect inguinal hernias in a nationwide population in Denmark.丹麦全国范围内直接和间接腹股沟疝的复发模式。
Surgery. 2014 Jan;155(1):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Oct 25.