Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 2;17(15):5580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155580.
The aim of this study was to compare illness concepts and coping strategies among native German cancer patients and those with a Turkish migration background.
Guideline-based, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 German (♂: 8, ♀: 3) and 11 Turkish (♂: 2, ♀: 9) cancer patients. The transcripts were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis in accordance with Mayring.
We identified eight categories of illness concepts: stressful life events, environmental influences, the will of God, medical factors, fate, trauma, health behaviour, and psychological causes. German patients frequently attributed their illness to environmental influences, persistent stress, or medical factors, whereas Turkish patients blamed persistent stress, the will of God, or trauma. The last two categories are not found among German patients. We classified the coping strategies into 11 main categories: social support, activity, patient competence, fighting spirit/positive thinking, use of health services/alternative healing methods, lifestyle, emotional coping, cognitive coping, religious coping, spiritual coping, and culture-specific methods for patients of Turkish origin. For German patients, activities as well as social support played primary roles in coping. Turkish patients also often used social support. However, in contrast to the German patients, they are less active and use much more religious coping and culture-specific means. In addition, negative emotions occur more often when processing the illness than in the German patients.
Common illness representations and coping strategies could be found for Turkish and German patients, but also specific ones for the respective group. It is particularly noticeable that German patients attach more importance to medical factors and try more actively to cope with the illness. For Turkish patients, cultural and religious factors play an important role, which should also be considered in treatment.
本研究旨在比较德国本土癌症患者和土耳其移民背景癌症患者的疾病观念和应对策略。
采用基于指南的半结构式访谈,对 11 名德国(♂:8,♀:3)和 11 名土耳其(♂:2,♀:9)癌症患者进行访谈。根据 Mayring 的方法,对转录本进行定性内容分析。
我们确定了 8 类疾病观念:生活事件压力、环境影响、上帝的意志、医疗因素、命运、创伤、健康行为和心理原因。德国患者经常将疾病归因于环境影响、持续的压力或医疗因素,而土耳其患者则归咎于持续的压力、上帝的意志或创伤。后两个类别在德国患者中没有发现。我们将应对策略分为 11 个主要类别:社会支持、活动、患者能力、斗志/积极思考、利用卫生服务/替代治疗方法、生活方式、情绪应对、认知应对、宗教应对、精神应对以及土耳其裔患者的特定文化方法。对于德国患者,活动和社会支持在应对中起着主要作用。土耳其患者也经常使用社会支持。然而,与德国患者不同的是,他们的活动较少,更多地使用宗教应对和特定文化的方法。此外,在处理疾病时,负面情绪比德国患者更常见。
可以为德国和土耳其患者找到共同的疾病表现和应对策略,但也可以为各自的群体找到特定的策略。特别值得注意的是,德国患者更重视医疗因素,并更积极地尝试应对疾病。对于土耳其患者,文化和宗教因素起着重要作用,在治疗中也应考虑这些因素。