Lee Soyon, Vania Diana K, Bhor Menaka, Revicki Dennis, Abogunrin Seye, Sarri Grammati
Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Evidera, London W6 8BJ, UK.
Int J Gen Med. 2020 Jul 7;13:361-377. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S257340. eCollection 2020.
To systematically estimate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and economic burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) among adults in the United States (US).
Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs), one each for the PROs and economic topics, were performed using MEDLINE and Embase to identify observational studies of adults with SCD. Included studies were published between 2007 and 2018 and evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQL), function, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), or costs. Given the high degree of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were summarized qualitatively.
The SLRs identified 7 studies evaluating the PROs and 15 studies evaluating the economic burden meeting the pre-specified selection criteria. The PRO evidence showed the prevalence of depression and anxiety to be 21-33% and 7-36%, respectively, in adults with SCD. The mean SF-36 physical summary scores ranged from 33.6 to 59.0 and from 46.3 to 61.5 for the mental summary scores. Overall HRQL for adults with SCD was poor and significantly worse in those with opioid use. Adult SCD patients were found to have varying rates of emergency department (ED) utilization (0.3-3.5 annual ED visits), hospitalizations (0.5-27.9 per patient per year), and/or readmission (12-41%). Key factors associated with significant HCRU were age, dental infection, and SCD-related complications. SCD specialized care settings and SCD intensive management strategy were reported to significantly decrease the number of hospitalizations.
This systematic evidence synthesis found that disease burden measured by PROs and economic burden of SCD on adults in the US are substantial despite the availability of approved SCD treatments during 2007-2018. The use of hydroxyurea, optimal management with opioids, and employing intensive treatment strategies may help decrease the overall burden to patients and healthcare systems. Published data on costs associated with SCD are limited and highlight the need for more economic studies to characterize the full burden of the disease.
系统评估美国成年人镰状细胞病(SCD)患者报告的结局(PROs)和经济负担。
进行了两项系统文献综述(SLRs),分别针对PROs和经济主题,使用MEDLINE和Embase检索关于成年SCD患者的观察性研究。纳入的研究发表于2007年至2018年之间,评估了与健康相关的生活质量(HRQL)、功能、医疗资源利用(HCRU)或成本。鉴于临床和方法学上的高度异质性,对研究结果进行了定性总结。
SLRs确定了7项评估PROs的研究和15项评估经济负担的研究,这些研究符合预先设定的选择标准。PROs证据显示,成年SCD患者中抑郁症和焦虑症的患病率分别为21%-33%和7%-36%。SF-36身体总结评分的平均值在33.6至59.0之间,心理总结评分在46.3至61.5之间。成年SCD患者的总体HRQL较差,使用阿片类药物的患者情况更差。发现成年SCD患者的急诊科(ED)利用率(每年0.3-3.5次ED就诊)、住院率(每位患者每年0.5-27.9次)和/或再入院率(12%-41%)各不相同。与显著HCRU相关的关键因素是年龄、牙齿感染和SCD相关并发症。据报道,SCD专科护理机构和SCD强化管理策略可显著减少住院次数。
该系统证据综合分析发现,尽管在2007年至2018年期间有批准的SCD治疗方法,但美国成年SCD患者以PROs衡量的疾病负担和经济负担仍然很大。使用羟基脲、阿片类药物的优化管理以及采用强化治疗策略可能有助于减轻患者和医疗系统的总体负担。关于SCD相关成本的已发表数据有限,这突出表明需要更多的经济学研究来描述该疾病的全部负担。