Patena John, Elster Leah, Hameed Tania, Kulkarni Sumedha, Lai Alden Yuanhong, Sweetland Annika C, Gyamfi Joyce, Ojo Temitope, Odoms-Young Angela, Royal Charmaine, Peprah Emmanuel
Implementing Sustainable Evidence-Based Interventions Through Engagement (ISEE) Lab, Department of Global and Environmental Health, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Department of Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 15;13:1607771. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1607771. eCollection 2025.
People living with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) experience higher rates of common mental disorders (CMD). There is an alarming treatment gap in the provision of adequate mental health services for CMDs in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). One solution is the implementation of task-sharing interventions such as the Friendship Bench which utilizes concepts of problem-solving therapy (PST). This investigation uses a qualitative study design to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a PST-based task-sharing mental health intervention for SCD populations in LMICs using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Purposive, convenience, and snowball sampling strategies were utilized to identify study participants targeting two key groups: (1) SCD stakeholders and (2) global mental health (GMH) experts. Key informant interviews were conducted between July-September 2024. A framework analysis approach was used by iterative deductive and inductive coding. Results were analyzed and synthesized into key themes and patterns, stratified by participant type to highlight variations across stakeholder perspectives.
A total of 16 participants completed key informant interviews: 10 (62.5%) were SCD stakeholders and 6 (37.5%) were GMH experts. The geographic scope of work spans 12 countries, with 9 (75.0%) located in sub-Saharan Africa. Both SCD stakeholders and GMH experts expressed a shared consensus on the urgent need for mental health care tailored to SCD populations in LMIC settings. Implementing a task-sharing mental health intervention was viewed as acceptable, however, perspectives on its feasibility varied. Identified barriers included the absence of robust health care systems, limited prioritization and funding for mental health, a shortage of trained mental health professionals, and the pervasive stigma surrounding both SCD and mental health conditions. Conversely, facilitators included the potential receptiveness of SCD populations to mental health care delivered by task-sharing providers, the integration of mental health services within SCD clinics to avoid external referrals, and the cultural adaptability of PST-based interventions.
Challenges associated with implementing task-sharing mental health interventions stem from larger systemic issues within healthcare systems and the integration of care. Task-sharing represents a critical component of the solution, but requires complementary, coordinated efforts to strengthen the health system holistically.
镰状细胞病(SCD)患者患常见精神障碍(CMD)的几率更高。在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC),为CMD提供充足心理健康服务方面存在令人担忧的治疗差距。一种解决方案是实施任务分担干预措施,如友谊长椅项目,该项目采用了解决问题疗法(PST)的理念。本研究采用定性研究设计,使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)来评估在LMIC中为SCD人群实施基于PST的任务分担心理健康干预措施的可接受性和可行性。
采用目的抽样、便利抽样和滚雪球抽样策略,确定了针对两个关键群体的研究参与者:(1)SCD利益相关者和(2)全球心理健康(GMH)专家。在2024年7月至9月期间进行了关键信息访谈。采用框架分析方法,通过迭代的演绎和归纳编码进行分析。结果被分析并综合为关键主题和模式,按参与者类型分层,以突出不同利益相关者观点的差异。
共有16名参与者完成了关键信息访谈:10名(62.5%)为SCD利益相关者,6名(37.5%)为GMH专家。工作的地理范围涵盖12个国家,其中9个(75.0%)位于撒哈拉以南非洲。SCD利益相关者和GMH专家都一致认为,迫切需要为LMIC环境中的SCD人群提供量身定制的心理健康护理。实施任务分担心理健康干预措施被认为是可以接受的,然而,对其可行性的看法各不相同。确定的障碍包括缺乏强大的医疗保健系统、对心理健康的优先重视和资金有限、训练有素的心理健康专业人员短缺,以及围绕SCD和心理健康状况的普遍污名化。相反,促进因素包括SCD人群对任务分担提供者提供的心理健康护理的潜在接受度、在SCD诊所内整合心理健康服务以避免外部转诊,以及基于PST的干预措施的文化适应性。
实施任务分担心理健康干预措施所面临的挑战源于医疗保健系统内部更大的系统性问题以及护理的整合。任务分担是解决方案的关键组成部分,但需要互补、协调的努力来全面加强卫生系统。