• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腺样体扁桃体切除术:照顾者对知情同意过程中所提供风险信息的回忆

ADENOTONSILLECTOMY: CARE GIVERS' RECALL OF INFORMATION ON RISKS PROVIDED DURING INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS.

作者信息

Kitcher E D, Searyoh K, Abaidoo B, Siale W, Sackitey S, Nyamekye E

机构信息

E.N.T. Unit, Department of Surgery, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 77, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.

Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology Unit, University of Ghana Medical School, P.O. Box 4236, Accra, Ghana.

出版信息

J West Afr Coll Surg. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):85-105.

PMID:32754458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7368578/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

"Informed consent" for surgery has been widely researched; however, there is no local data on surgical risk recall by care givers' (usually a parent) of children undergoing adenotonsillectomy (Ts &A).

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated care givers' recall of the surgical risks for Ts&A after verbal explanation compared to combined verbal and written explanation in the informed consent process.

DESIGN OF THE STUDY

This was a prospective randomized comparative study of fifty parents/guardians of patients undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy for obstructive sleep disorders.

SETTING

The E.N. T. Unit, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parents/guardians of children were randomized to only verbal explanation or combined verbal and written explanations prior to signing informed consent a day before their wards' operation. Recall of surgical risks explained in the informed consent procedure was evaluated two days postoperatively. The rates of surgical risk recall for the two groups were analysed and compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics of the parents/guardians. The overall recall rate for surgical risks for the whole group was 46.0%. The surgical risk recall rate for the verbal explanation group, 44.4% was not significantly different from that for the combined verbal and written explanation group, 47.2% (p=0.624). There was a weak but significant positive correlation between risk recall scores and parental level of education (Spearman r=0.306; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Among parents/guardians whose children were undergoing adenotonsillectomy, combining written explanation with verbal explanation in the informed consent process did not significantly improve postoperative surgical risks recall rate when compared with only verbal explanation. The overall risk recall rate was 46.0%. A study with larger sample sizes is recommended to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

手术“知情同意”已得到广泛研究;然而,关于接受腺样体扁桃体切除术(Ts&A)的儿童的护理人员(通常是父母)对手术风险的记忆,尚无本地数据。

目的

本研究评估了在知情同意过程中,与口头和书面解释相结合相比,口头解释后护理人员对Ts&A手术风险的记忆情况。

研究设计

这是一项针对五十名因阻塞性睡眠障碍接受扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术患者的父母/监护人的前瞻性随机对照研究。

地点

加纳阿克拉科尔勒布教学医院耳鼻喉科。

材料与方法

在患儿手术前一天签署知情同意书之前,将患儿的父母/监护人随机分为仅接受口头解释组或接受口头和书面解释组。术后两天评估对知情同意程序中所解释的手术风险的记忆情况。分析并比较两组的手术风险记忆率。

结果

父母/监护人的人口统计学特征无显著差异。整个组的手术风险总体记忆率为46.0%。口头解释组的手术风险记忆率为44.4%,与口头和书面解释相结合组的47.2%无显著差异(p = 0.624)。风险记忆分数与父母教育水平之间存在微弱但显著的正相关(斯皮尔曼r = 0.306;p = 0.015)。

结论

在其子女接受腺样体扁桃体切除术的父母/监护人中,与仅进行口头解释相比,在知情同意过程中将书面解释与口头解释相结合并不能显著提高术后手术风险记忆率。总体风险记忆率为46.0%。建议进行更大样本量的研究以证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
ADENOTONSILLECTOMY: CARE GIVERS' RECALL OF INFORMATION ON RISKS PROVIDED DURING INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS.腺样体扁桃体切除术:照顾者对知情同意过程中所提供风险信息的回忆
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):85-105.
2
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
3
The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks.知情同意在耳鼻喉科手术风险回忆中的作用:口头(非干预)与书面(干预)风险摘要。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):485-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
4
Informed Consent in Pediatric Otolaryngology: What Risks and Benefits Do Parents Recall?小儿耳鼻喉科中的知情同意:父母记得哪些风险和益处?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug;155(2):332-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599816641910. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
5
Informed consent in otologic surgery: prospective study of risk recall by patients and impact of written summaries of risk.耳科手术中的知情同意:患者对风险回忆的前瞻性研究及风险书面总结的影响
J Otolaryngol. 2003 Dec;32(6):368-72. doi: 10.2310/7070.2003.13987.
6
Informed consent in trauma: does written information improve patient recall of risks? A prospective randomised study.创伤知情同意:书面信息是否能提高患者对风险的记忆?一项前瞻性随机研究。
Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.419. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
7
Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Recall Fewer Than 50% of the Risks Discussed in the Informed Consent Process Preoperatively and the Recall Rate Worsens Significantly in the Postoperative Period.成人脊柱畸形患者术前能回忆起的知情同意过程中讨论的风险不到50%,且术后回忆率显著下降。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul 15;40(14):1079-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000964.
8
Informed consent in pediatric surgery: Do parents understand the risks?小儿外科中的知情同意:家长是否理解风险?
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Mar;136(3):265-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.5.
9
Informed consent in minor and intermediate pediatric elective surgery: results of an in-house questionnaire.小儿择期手术中未成年人及中等年龄段儿童的知情同意:一份内部调查问卷的结果
Front Surg. 2023 May 5;10:1194657. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1194657. eCollection 2023.
10
Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information.白内障手术的知情同意:患者对口头、书面和录像信息的理解。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Structured Preoperative Phone Counseling by Junior Medical Staff for Improving the Consent Process for Tonsillectomy.初级医务人员进行结构化术前电话咨询以改善扁桃体切除术的知情同意流程
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):1040-1045. doi: 10.1177/0194599816666069. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
2
Informed Consent in Pediatric Otolaryngology: What Risks and Benefits Do Parents Recall?小儿耳鼻喉科中的知情同意:父母记得哪些风险和益处?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug;155(2):332-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599816641910. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
3
Pediatric otoplasty and informed consent: do information handouts improve parental risk recall?小儿耳部整形术与知情同意:信息手册能否提高家长对风险的认知?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Dec;78(12):2258-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.10.028. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
4
Informed consent for emergency surgery--how much do parents truly remember?急诊手术的知情同意——父母究竟能记住多少?
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 May;49(5):795-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.075. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
5
Using multimedia to enhance the consent process for bunion correction surgery.利用多媒体加强拇囊炎矫正手术的知情同意过程。
ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):249-54. doi: 10.1111/ans.12534.
6
Enhancing patient understanding of medical procedures: evaluation of an interactive multimedia program with in-line exercises.增强患者对医疗程序的理解:带有在线练习的交互式多媒体程序的评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 May;83(5):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
7
Effect of the informed consent process on anxiety and comprehension of patients undergoing esophageal and gastrointestinal surgery.知情同意过程对食管和胃肠手术患者焦虑和理解的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jun;15(6):922-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1517-7. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
8
The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks.知情同意在耳鼻喉科手术风险回忆中的作用:口头(非干预)与书面(干预)风险摘要。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):485-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
9
Informed consent in oral surgery: the value of written information.口腔外科手术中的知情同意:书面信息的价值。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;69(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.036. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
10
Informed consent: what do patients really want to know?知情同意:患者真正想了解什么?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Aug;68(8):1849-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Jun 9.