The Department of General Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
The Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Int Wound J. 2020 Dec;17(6):1817-1828. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13470. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Perineal wound complications after APR have high morbidity in the colorectal surgical department. Although some approaches have been figured out to solve this clinical focus, the outcomes are still not satisfied. Herein, this prospective comparative clinical trial has been designed to evaluate a new surgical procedure of direct perineal wound full-thick closure (DPWC), compared with conventional perineal wound closure (CPWC), with hopes of making wound healing with less complications. In addition, an evaluation of an incision negative wound pressure therapy, as another focus in this field, was also analysed in the DPWC group. A total of 44 participants in our department were recruited from March 2018 to March 2020, divided into two groups randomly, CPWC group and DPWC group. The patients' characteristics, such as age, gender, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, comorbidities, CEA level, and high-risk of invasion, were recorded without statistical significance between the CPWC group and DPWC group. After the same standard abdominal phase, these two groups were performed in different perineal phases. And then, operative and postoperative outcomes were analysed with different statistical methods. Data on wound healing time and length of stay in the DPWC group were shorter than those in the CPWC group (P < .05). Furthermore, cases of wound infection within 30 days in the DPWC group were also less than that in the CPWC group (P < .05). However, no difference was found between the incisional negative pressure wound therapy assisted group (NPA group) and non- incisional negative pressure wound therapy assisted group (non-NPA group). During this study, hypoalbuminemia, as an independent high-risk factor, impacted perineal wound healing. (P = .0271) In conclusion, DPWC is a new surgical approach, which can lead to a better outcome than DPWC, and it can be another surgical procedure for clinicians. In addition, hypoalbuminemia should be interfered for avoiding perineal wound complications.
直肠肛门切除术后会阴部伤口并发症在结直肠外科具有较高的发病率。尽管已经提出了一些方法来解决这一临床焦点问题,但结果仍不尽如人意。在此,我们设计了一项前瞻性对照临床试验,旨在评估一种新的直接会阴全层伤口闭合术(DPWC)与传统会阴伤口闭合术(CPWC)的比较,以期使伤口愈合并发症更少。此外,还对 DPWC 组中另一个关注领域的切口负压伤口治疗进行了分析。
2018 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月,我科共招募 44 名患者,随机分为两组,CPWC 组和 DPWC 组。CPWC 组和 DPWC 组患者的年龄、性别、BMI、吸烟、饮酒、合并症、CEA 水平和侵袭高危因素等特征无统计学差异。两组患者在相同的腹部标准阶段后,在不同的会阴阶段进行手术。然后,采用不同的统计方法分析手术和术后结果。DPWC 组的伤口愈合时间和住院时间均短于 CPWC 组(P<0.05)。此外,DPWC 组术后 30 天内伤口感染的病例也少于 CPWC 组(P<0.05)。然而,切口负压伤口治疗辅助组(NPA 组)和非切口负压伤口治疗辅助组(非-NPA 组)之间无差异。
在这项研究中,低白蛋白血症作为一个独立的高危因素,影响了会阴部伤口的愈合。(P=0.0271)
总之,DPWC 是一种新的手术方法,其效果优于 DPWC,可以为临床医生提供另一种手术选择。此外,应干预低白蛋白血症以避免会阴伤口并发症。