British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottinghamshire NG12 5GG, UK; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
British Geological Survey, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 20;744:140674. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140674. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
Faecally-contaminated drinking water is a risk to human health, with the greatest risks to those living in developing countries. UN Sustainable Development Goal 6 aims to address this issue. Tryptophan-like fluorescence (TLF) shows potential as a rapid method for detecting microbial contamination in drinking water, which could reduce the spread of waterborne diseases. This study is the first to investigate the effectiveness of TLF for a large-scale survey using a randomised, spot-sampling approach. The large-scale survey took place in Malawi, sub-Saharan Africa, in the dry season (n = 183). A subset of sources were revisited at the end of the following wet season (n = 41). The effectiveness of TLF was assessed by comparing TLF results to thermotolerant coliforms (TTC), humic-like fluorescence (HLF), inorganic hydrochemical data and sanitary risk scores. The most prominent differences in microbial water quality were observed between source types, with little variation between districts and seasons. TLF, TTCs, turbidity and sanitary risk scores were all elevated at alternative sources (shallow wells and tap stands) compared to hand-pumped boreholes. In the dry season, 18% of hand-pumped boreholes showed TTC contamination, which increase to 21% in the wet season. Groundwater recharge processes are likely responsible for seasonal variability of inorganic hydrochemistry at hand-pumped boreholes. TLF was able to distinguish no and low WHO risk classes (TTC 0-9 cfu/100 mL) from medium, high and very high risk classes (TTC 10 - >1000 cfu/100 mL). TLF failed to distinguish between no and low risk classes, which limits the use of TLF for assessing water quality to drinking water standards. This dataset indicates that HLF may raise baseline TLF for samples with low TLF values, increasing false positives. Therefore, TLF is better suited as a rapid high-level water quality screening tool to assess moderate and high levels of faecal contamination.
粪便污染的饮用水对人类健康构成威胁,发展中国家的居民面临的风险最大。联合国可持续发展目标 6 旨在解决这一问题。色氨酸样荧光(TLF)显示出作为一种快速检测饮用水中微生物污染的方法具有潜力,可以减少水传播疾病的传播。本研究首次使用随机抽样方法对 TLF 进行了大规模调查的有效性研究。大规模调查在非洲撒哈拉以南的马拉维的旱季进行(n=183)。在下一个雨季结束时,对其中一部分水源进行了复查(n=41)。通过将 TLF 结果与耐热大肠菌群(TTC)、腐殖质样荧光(HLF)、无机水化学数据和卫生风险评分进行比较,评估了 TLF 的有效性。在水源类型之间观察到微生物水质的最显著差异,而在地区和季节之间差异很小。与手压井相比,TLF、TTCs、浊度和卫生风险评分在替代水源(浅井和水龙头站)中均升高。在旱季,18%的手压井显示出 TTC 污染,而在雨季则增加到 21%。地下水补给过程可能是手压井无机水化学季节性变化的原因。TLF 能够区分 WHO 风险等级为无风险和低风险(TTC 0-9cfu/100mL)与中风险、高风险和极高风险等级(TTC 10- >1000cfu/100mL)。TLF 无法区分无风险和低风险等级,这限制了 TLF 用于评估水质达到饮用水标准的用途。本数据集表明,HLF 可能会提高 TLF 值低的样本的基线 TLF 值,从而增加假阳性。因此,TLF 更适合作为一种快速的水质筛选工具,用于评估中度和高度粪便污染。