Reuman Lillian, Buchholz Jennifer, Blakey Shannon, Abramowitz Jonathan S
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Cogn Psychother. 2017;31(3):191-203. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.31.3.191. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
Cognitive-behavioral models of obsessions, although widely accepted, do not entirely explain obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms. Constructs from relational frame theory (RFT; e.g., cognitive fusion-the tendency for behavior to be overly regulated and influenced by cognition) may improve our understanding of OC symptoms above and beyond cognitive-behavioral constructs (e.g., intolerance of uncertainty [IU]). This study examined the extent to which cognitive fusion accounts for unique variability in four OC symptom dimensions: contamination, responsibility for harm, unacceptable thoughts, and order/symmetry. Participants completed measures of cognitive fusion, general distress, thought action fusion, IU, and OC symptoms. Regression analyses showed that IU and thought-action fusion (TAF) were significant predictors across the OC symptom dimensions; however, cognitive fusion was only a unique predictor of the unacceptable thoughts symptom dimension. Results support the notion that RFT may best relate to the unacceptable thoughts domain of OCD. Study findings, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
尽管强迫症的认知行为模型已被广泛接受,但并不能完全解释强迫症状。关系框架理论(RFT)中的概念(例如,认知融合——行为过度受认知调节和影响的倾向)可能会增进我们对强迫症状的理解,超越认知行为概念(例如,对不确定性的不耐受[IU])。本研究考察了认知融合在强迫症状四个维度(污染、伤害责任、不可接受的想法以及秩序/对称)中解释独特变异性的程度。参与者完成了认知融合、一般痛苦、思维行动融合、对不确定性的不耐受以及强迫症状的测量。回归分析表明,对不确定性的不耐受和思维行动融合(TAF)是强迫症状各维度的显著预测因素;然而,认知融合只是不可接受的想法症状维度的独特预测因素。结果支持了这样一种观点,即关系框架理论可能与强迫症的不可接受的想法领域联系最为紧密。讨论了研究结果、局限性和未来方向。