Lee Sang Won, Lee Seung Jae, Choi Mina
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Jan;22(1):93-101. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0209. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
Evidence suggests that acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) processes function as transdiagnostic factors in both major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) individually. However, few studies have directly compared these two clinical disorders. Therefore, this study aimed to identify potential transdiagnostic factors associated with ACT across MDD, OCD, and healthy control (HC) groups.
A total of 34 MDD patients, 43 OCD patients, and 46 HCs were recruited through subway advertisements and outpatient services at a university hospital. Participants completed the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire, thought-action fusion (TAF) scale, and symptom severity scales.
Direct group comparisons revealed higher psychological inflexibility, cognitive fusion, and likelihood of TAF in the clinical groups compared to the HCs, with no differences between the MDD and OCD groups. These three transdiagnostic factors were variously correlated with both depressive and obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms in all groups. Regression analyses demonstrated that the three transdiagnostic factors accounted for 26% of the depressive symptoms in the MDD group (R2=0.26, p=0.028) and 27% of the OC symptoms in the OCD group (R2=0.27, p=0.014).
These findings from the direct group comparisons of the three groups confirmed that psychological inflexibility, cognitive fusion, and likelihood of TAF are potential transdiagnostic factors that moderately contribute to the primary symptoms of both MDD and OCD. From another perspective, these results also highlight the need to consider how ACT addresses disorder-specific variations beyond what is explained by these transdiagnostic factors in the future.
有证据表明,接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)的过程分别在重度抑郁症(MDD)和强迫症(OCD)中作为跨诊断因素发挥作用。然而,很少有研究直接比较这两种临床疾病。因此,本研究旨在确定在MDD、OCD和健康对照(HC)组中与ACT相关的潜在跨诊断因素。
通过地铁广告和大学医院的门诊服务招募了34名MDD患者、43名OCD患者和46名HC。参与者完成了接纳与行动问卷-II、认知融合问卷、思维-行动融合(TAF)量表和症状严重程度量表。
直接组间比较显示,与HC组相比,临床组的心理灵活性更低、认知融合程度更高以及TAF的可能性更大,MDD组和OCD组之间无差异。这三个跨诊断因素在所有组中均与抑郁和强迫症状有不同程度的相关性。回归分析表明,这三个跨诊断因素在MDD组中占抑郁症状的26%(R2=0.26,p=0.028),在OCD组中占强迫症状的27%(R2=0.27,p=0.014)。
三组直接组间比较的这些结果证实,心理灵活性、认知融合和TAF的可能性是潜在的跨诊断因素,对MDD和OCD的主要症状有中等程度的影响。从另一个角度来看,这些结果也凸显了未来需要考虑ACT如何解决这些跨诊断因素无法解释的特定疾病差异。