• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本科生护生体重敏感训练。

Weight Sensitivity Training Among Undergraduate Nursing Students.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2020 Aug 1;59(8):453-456. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200723-06.

DOI:10.3928/01484834-20200723-06
PMID:32757009
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A Curriculum Embedded Weight Sensitivity Training program (CeWebs) was integrated into an undergraduate nursing course to improve attitudes and beliefs toward individuals with obesity.

METHOD

A one-group repeated measures study was conducted to compare students' pretest and posttest attitudes and beliefs using the Attitudes Toward Obese Persons (ATOP) and Beliefs About Obese Persons (BAOP) at the beginning and end of the semester.

RESULTS

Comparison of pretraining and posttraining scores of 125 junior nursing students on ATOP (73.96 ± 15.02 and 84.59 ± 15.39, respectively) indicated a significant increase in scores (p < .01), which reflects more positive attitudes. Comparison of pretraining and posttraining BAOP scores (18.20 ± 6.84 and 22.22 ± 7.87, respectively) indicated a significant (p < .01) increase in scores, indicating beliefs that obesity is not controllable.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that embedding weight sensitivity training into undergraduate nursing curricula may improve attitudes and beliefs toward patients with obesity. [J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(8):453-456.].

摘要

背景

课程嵌入式体重敏感训练项目(CeWebs)被整合到本科护理课程中,以改善对肥胖个体的态度和信念。

方法

采用单组重复测量研究,在学期开始和结束时使用肥胖者态度量表(ATOP)和肥胖者信念量表(BAOP)对 125 名护理专业大三学生进行前测和后测,比较学生的态度和信念。

结果

对 125 名护理专业大三学生的 ATOP(分别为 73.96 ± 15.02 和 84.59 ± 15.39)和 BAOP(分别为 18.20 ± 6.84 和 22.22 ± 7.87)前测和后测得分进行比较,结果表明 ATOP 得分显著增加(p <.01),这反映出更积极的态度。BAOP 得分也显著增加(p <.01),表明肥胖是不可控的信念。

结论

这些发现表明,将体重敏感训练嵌入本科护理课程中可能会改善对肥胖患者的态度和信念。[J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(8):453-456.]。

相似文献

1
Weight Sensitivity Training Among Undergraduate Nursing Students.本科生护生体重敏感训练。
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Aug 1;59(8):453-456. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200723-06.
2
Evaluation of nurse's attitudes toward adult patients of size.评估护士对成人超大体重患者的态度。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;7(4):536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
3
Investigation of psychometric properties of Turkish version of nursing students' attitudes and beliefs towards Childhood Obesity Scale.中文版《护理学生对儿童肥胖态度和信念量表》的心理测量学特性研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2023 Apr;43:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2022.12.029. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
4
Perceptions of nursing students about individuals with obesity problems: Belief, attitude, phobia.护理专业学生对肥胖问题个体的认知:信念、态度、恐惧。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Apr;57(2):777-785. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12613. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
5
Development of a weight bias reduction intervention for third-year nursing students.为三年级护理学生开发一项体重偏见减少干预措施。
Clin Obes. 2022 Apr;12(2):e12498. doi: 10.1111/cob.12498. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
6
The impact of an educational program based on the reproductive health of LGBT individuals developed for nursing students to improve the knowledge, skills and attitudes of students: A quasi-experimental study.为护理专业学生开展的基于LGBT人群生殖健康的教育项目对提高学生知识、技能和态度的影响:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jul;70:103668. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103668. Epub 2023 May 17.
7
Too big to be seen: Weight-based discrimination among nursing students.
Nurs Forum. 2018 Oct;53(4):529-534. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12282. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
Using Trigger Films as a Bariatric Sensitivity Intervention: Improving Nursing Students' Attitudes and Beliefs About Caring for Obese Patients.使用触发影片作为肥胖症敏感性干预措施:改善护理专业学生对照顾肥胖患者的态度和信念。
Nurse Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;41(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000225.
9
To embed or not to embed? A longitudinal study exploring the impact of curriculum design on the evidence-based practice profiles of UK pre-registration nursing students.是否融入?一项纵向研究,探讨课程设计对英国预注册护理专业学生循证实践概况的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Nov;58:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
10
A Missed Opportunity to Cultivate Positive Attitudes about Mental Health Recovery among Undergraduate Nursing Students - A Quasi-Experimental Controlled Study.错失培养本科护生心理健康康复积极态度的机会——一项准实验对照研究。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Apr;45(4):391-398. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2023.2291653. Epub 2024 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Weight Bias in Nursing: A Pilot Study on Feasibility and Negative Attitude Assessment Among Primary Care Nurses.护理中的体重偏见:基层护理护士可行性及消极态度评估的一项试点研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 12;15(5):168. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050168.
2
An Assessment of the Long-Term Efficacy of an Undergraduate Curriculum-Embedded Weight Bias Intervention in Practicing Registered Nurses.本科课程嵌入式体重偏见干预对执业注册护士的长期疗效评估。
Obes Sci Pract. 2025 Apr 11;11(2):e70072. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70072. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Weight Stigma Amongst Nurses and Nursing Students: A Scoping Review of Direct and Comparative Evidence.
护士及护生中的体重歧视:直接证据与比较证据的范围综述
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5806-5823. doi: 10.1111/jan.16843. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
4
Obesity Stigma Among Healthcare Workers in a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家教学医院医护人员的肥胖污名。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241303326. doi: 10.1177/21501319241303326.
5
Efficacy of interventions aimed at reducing explicit and implicit weight bias in healthcare students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.旨在减少医学生显性和隐性体重偏见的干预措施的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2025 Feb;26(2):e13847. doi: 10.1111/obr.13847. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
6
Clinical observations of weight stigma among nursing students: A descriptive approach.护理专业学生体重歧视的临床观察:一种描述性方法。
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 Sep 20;10(5):e70008. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70008. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Does terminology matter when measuring stigmatizing attitudes about weight? Validation of a brief, modified attitudes toward obese persons scale.在衡量对体重的污名化态度时,术语重要吗?一种简短的、经过修改的对肥胖者态度量表的验证。
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 Aug 21;10(4):e70005. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70005. eCollection 2024 Aug.