Suppr超能文献

滴灌能否减少小麦和油菜田的氧化亚氮排放?

Can fertigation reduce nitrous oxide emissions from wheat and canola fields?

机构信息

Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2EG, Canada.

Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2EG, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 25;745:141014. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141014. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

Abstract

Increasing nitrogen fertilization and irrigation can contribute to nitrous oxide (NO) emissions from agriculture. Relative to the conventional practice of one-pass fertilization with all N applied at crop seeding, this study examined how splitting the total N fertilization into seeding time and in-crop fertigation impacts NO emission factors (EF) in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) and canola (Brassica napus) in Southern Alberta, Canada during two growing seasons (May to Oct. in 2015 and 2016). With all the N applied at crop seeding, the growing-season NO EF of irrigated wheat and canola was in average 0.23 ± 0.03%. Conversely, implementing N fertigation lowered the magnitudes of NO EF in each of the four crop-years, averaging 0.16 ± 0.04%. Most of the reductions in NO emissions due to fertigation occurred with low and intermediate N rates (total rates of 60 and 90 kg N ha) and in the second year of the study. This second year had recurrent, early-season rainfalls following seeding (and prior to fertigation) that triggered differences in the daily and cumulative NO fluxes. Within this year, fertigation on wheat consistently lowered the growing-season NO EF from a high of 0.27% to only 0.11% (P < 0.001). Also, at the intermediate rate of 90 kg N ha, fertigation synergistically reduced the NO EF of canola by half, from 0.13% to 0.06% (P < 0.01). However, the mitigating effects of fertigation vanished with the highest N rate in the study (120 kg N ha). Even with fertigation, this highest N rate resulted in high emissions in wheat, and lesser so in canola in part due to the higher N uptake of canola. Moreover, canola often manifested narrower ratios of NO emission-to-grain yield (EF) than wheat. This interplay of crop species, rainfall and N management suggests that implementing fertigation with reduced N rates can proactively mitigates NO.

摘要

增加氮肥和灌溉可以导致农业的一氧化二氮(NO)排放。与传统的一次性施肥方法(所有 N 在作物播种时一次性施用)相比,本研究探讨了在加拿大艾伯塔省南部两个生长季节(2015 年 5 月至 10 月和 2016 年)中,将总氮施肥分为播种期和作物期施肥如何影响灌溉小麦(Triticum aestivum)和油菜(Brassica napus)的 NO 排放因子(EF)。所有 N 在作物播种时施用,灌溉小麦和油菜的生长季 NO EF 平均为 0.23±0.03%。相反,实施氮施肥降低了四个作物年中每个作物年的 NO EF,平均为 0.16±0.04%。由于施肥,NO 排放量的大部分减少发生在低氮和中氮(总氮 60 和 90kg/ha)和研究的第二年。第二年,在播种后(施肥前)有反复的早季降雨,这导致了每日和累积 NO 通量的差异。在这一年中,施肥一直将小麦的生长季 NO EF 从 0.27%降低到 0.11%(P<0.001)。同样,在中氮 90kg/ha 时,施肥协同降低了油菜的 NO EF 一半,从 0.13%到 0.06%(P<0.01)。然而,在研究中的最高氮率下,施肥的缓解作用消失了。即使施肥,最高氮率也导致小麦排放高,油菜排放较低,部分原因是油菜对氮的吸收较高。此外,油菜的 NO 排放与籽粒产量的比值(EF)通常比小麦窄。这种作物种类、降雨和氮管理的相互作用表明,采用较低氮率的施肥可以主动缓解 NO。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验