Suppr超能文献

解决生命周期评估中的时间考虑因素。

Addressing temporal considerations in life cycle assessment.

机构信息

Empa Materials Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, CH-9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland.

IFP Energies Nouvelles, 1 et 4 Avenue de Bois-Préau, 92852 Rueil-Malmaison, France.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 15;743:140700. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140700. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

Abstract

In life cycle assessment (LCA), temporal considerations are usually lost during the life cycle inventory calculation, resulting in an aggregated "snapshot" of potential impacts. Disregarding such temporal considerations has previously been underlined as an important source of uncertainty, but a growing number of approaches have been developed to tackle this issue. Nevertheless, their adoption by LCA practitioners is still uncommon, which raises concerns about the representativeness of current LCA results. Furthermore, a lack of consistency can be observed in the used terms for discussions on temporal considerations. The purpose of this review is thus to search for common ground and to identify the current implementation challenges while also proposing development pathways. This paper introduces a glossary of the most frequently used terms related to temporal considerations in LCA to build a common understanding of key concepts and to facilitate discussions. A review is also performed on current solutions for temporal considerations in different LCA phases (goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory analysis and life cycle impact assessment), analysing each temporal consideration for its relevant conceptual developments in LCA and its level of operationalisation. We then present a potential stepwise approach and development pathways to address the current challenges of implementation for dynamic LCA (DLCA). Three key focal areas for integrating temporal considerations within the LCA framework are discussed: i) define the temporal scope over which temporal distributions of emissions are occurring, ii) use calendar-specific information to model systems and associated impacts, and iii) select the appropriate level of temporal resolution to describe the variations of flows and characterisation factors. Addressing more temporal considerations within a DLCA framework is expected to reduce uncertainties and increase the representativeness of results, but possible trade-offs between additional data collection efforts and the increased value of results from DLCAs should be kept in mind.

摘要

在生命周期评估 (LCA) 中,通常在生命周期清单计算过程中忽略时间因素,导致潜在影响的综合“快照”。以前曾强调过忽略这些时间因素是一个重要的不确定性来源,但已经开发出越来越多的方法来解决这个问题。然而,LCA 从业者对这些方法的采用仍然不常见,这引起了对当前 LCA 结果代表性的关注。此外,在讨论时间因素时,使用的术语缺乏一致性。因此,本综述的目的是寻找共同点,确定当前实施挑战,同时提出发展途径。本文引入了与 LCA 中时间因素相关的最常用术语词汇表,以建立对关键概念的共同理解并促进讨论。还对不同 LCA 阶段(目标和范围定义、生命周期清单分析和生命周期影响评估)中时间因素的当前解决方案进行了综述,分析了每个时间因素在 LCA 中的相关概念发展及其操作化水平。然后,我们提出了一种潜在的分步方法和发展途径,以解决动态 LCA (DLCA) 的当前实施挑战。讨论了在 LCA 框架内整合时间因素的三个关键焦点领域:i)定义排放时间分布发生的时间范围,ii)使用日历特定信息来建模系统和相关影响,以及 iii)选择适当的时间分辨率级别来描述流量和特征化因子的变化。在 DLCA 框架内纳入更多时间因素有望降低不确定性并提高结果的代表性,但应牢记在额外数据收集工作和 DLCAs 结果的增值之间可能存在权衡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验