Puigcorbé Viena, Ruiz-González Clara, Masqué Pere, Gasol Josep M
School of Science, Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1645. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01645. eCollection 2020.
Microbes associated with sinking marine particles play key roles in carbon sequestration in the ocean. The sampling of particle-attached microorganisms is often done with sediment traps or by filtration of water collected with oceanographic bottles, both involving a certain time lapse between collection and processing of samples that may result in changes in particle-attached microbial communities. Conversely, water filtration through submersible pumps allows a faster storage of sampled particles, but it has rarely been used to study the associated microbial communities and has never been compared to other particle-sampling methods in terms of the recovery of particle microbial diversity. Here we compared the prokaryotic communities attached to small (1-53 μm) and large (>53 μm) particles collected from the mesopelagic zone (100-300 m) of two Antarctic polynyas using pumps (ISP) and oceanographic bottles (BTL). Each sampling method retrieved largely different particle-attached communities, suggesting that they capture different kinds of particles. These device-driven differences were greater for large particles than for small particles. Overall, the ISP recovered 1.5- to 3-fold more particle-attached bacterial taxa than the BTL, and different taxonomic groups were preferentially recovered by each method. In particular, typical particle-attached groups such as Planctomycetes and Deltaproteobacteria recovered with ISP were nearly absent from BTL samples. Our results suggest that the method used to sample marine particles has a strong influence in our view of their associated microbial communities.
与下沉海洋颗粒相关的微生物在海洋碳固存中发挥着关键作用。对附着在颗粒上的微生物进行采样通常使用沉积物捕获器,或者通过过滤用海洋学采水瓶采集的水样来完成,这两种方法都涉及样品采集和处理之间的一定时间间隔,这可能会导致附着在颗粒上的微生物群落发生变化。相反,通过潜水泵进行水过滤可以更快地储存采样颗粒,但很少用于研究相关的微生物群落,并且从未在颗粒微生物多样性的回收率方面与其他颗粒采样方法进行过比较。在这里,我们使用泵(ISP)和海洋学采水瓶(BTL)比较了从两个南极冰间湖的中层带(100 - 300米)采集的附着在小颗粒(1 - 53微米)和大颗粒(>53微米)上的原核生物群落。每种采样方法获得的附着在颗粒上的群落差异很大,这表明它们捕获的是不同种类的颗粒。这些由设备驱动的差异对于大颗粒比小颗粒更大。总体而言,ISP回收的附着在颗粒上的细菌分类单元比BTL多1.5至3倍,并且每种方法优先回收不同的分类群。特别是,ISP回收的典型附着在颗粒上的类群,如浮霉菌门和δ变形菌门,在BTL样品中几乎不存在。我们的结果表明,用于采样海洋颗粒的方法对我们对其相关微生物群落的看法有很大影响。