Orthopaedic Department, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Serres, Drama, Greece.
Int Orthop. 2021 Apr;45(4):821-835. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04660-4. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
To assess the effects of the available coating methods against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) biofilm development on titanium implants.
We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases until May 18, 2019, for studies that used animal models of infections to evaluate various titanium implant coating methods to prevent S. aureus infection. Twenty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion in qualitative synthesis. Of those, twenty-three were considered in pair-wise meta-analysis. In addition, subgroup analysis of implant protection strategies relative to uncoated controls was performed, and any adverse events stemming from the coating applications were reported. Quality assessment was performed using SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.
Meta-analysis showed that active coating with antibiotics was favoured over uncoated controls (standardised mean differences [SMD] for MRSA and MSSA were - 2.71 [95% CI, - 4.24 to - 1.18], p = 0.0005, and - 2.5 [- 3.79 to - 1.22], p = 0.0001, respectively). Likewise, large effect sizes were demonstrated when a combination of active and conventional non-degradable passive coatings was compared with controls (SMDs for MRSA and MSSA were - 0.62 [95% CI, - 1.15 to - 0.08], p = 0.02, and - 1.93 [95% CI, - 2.87 to - 0.98], p < 0.001, respectively).
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: As a standalone prevention method, active titanium coating with antibiotics yielded promising results against both MSSA and MRSA. Combinations between active and non-degradable passive coatings, potentially allowing for sustained antimicrobial substance release, provided consistent hardware infection protection. Thus, we recommend that future research efforts focus on combined coating modalities against S. aureus biofilm infections in the presence of titanium implants.
CRD42019123462.
评估现有的涂层方法对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)生物膜在钛植入物上发展的影响。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 数据库,截至 2019 年 5 月 18 日,以寻找使用动物感染模型评估各种钛植入物涂层方法以预防金黄色葡萄球菌感染的研究。有 27 项研究符合纳入定性综合分析的标准。其中,23 项研究进行了两两荟萃分析。此外,还对相对于未涂层对照的植入物保护策略进行了亚组分析,并报告了任何源自涂层应用的不良事件。使用 SYRCLE 的动物研究偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。
荟萃分析表明,抗生素主动涂层优于未涂层对照(MRSA 和 MSSA 的标准化均数差分别为-2.71[95%置信区间,-4.24 至-1.18],p=0.0005 和-2.5[-3.79 至-1.22],p=0.0001)。同样,当主动和传统非降解被动涂层的组合与对照相比时,也显示出较大的效应量(MRSA 和 MSSA 的标准化均数差分别为-0.62[95%置信区间,-1.15 至-0.08],p=0.02 和-1.93[95%置信区间,-2.87 至-0.98],p<0.001)。
讨论/结论:作为一种独立的预防方法,抗生素主动钛涂层对 MSSA 和 MRSA 均显示出有希望的结果。主动和非降解被动涂层的组合,可能允许持续释放抗菌物质,为硬件感染提供一致的保护。因此,我们建议未来的研究重点关注在钛植入物存在的情况下,针对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜感染的联合涂层模式。
CRD42019123462。