Department of Nutrition, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, CO.
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Dec;52(12):1088-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Develop and establish the reliability and validity of dietary behavior evaluation questions for the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP).
A mixed-methods study using cognitive interviews, expert panels, test/retest reliability, and pretests/posttests.
14 states across the US.
A convenience sample of low-income EFNEP or EFNEP-eligible participants for cognitive interviews (n = 111), reliability testing (n = 181), and sensitivity to change testing (n = 382).
Indicators of face and content validity, temporal reliability, and sensitivity to change.
Questions interpreted as intended in cognitive interviews, intraclass correlation coefficient and Spearman rank-order correlation for reliability testing; paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for sensitivity to change; and exploratory factor analyses to identify possible scales.
Cognitive interviews resulted in 3 rounds of question revisions; reliability value ranges were 0.48-0.77 for intraclass correlation coefficient and 0.43-0.77 for Spearman rank-order correlation. For sensitivity to change, 9 items had evidence of change (P < 0.05) between pretests and posttests, whereas 5 items had evidence for change after removing those with little room to change. Two scales were identified: diet quality and non-cheese dairy.
The EFNEP's new dietary behavior evaluation questions demonstrated face and content validity, moderate to strong reliability, and sensitivity to detect self-reported behavior changes among low-income, diverse populations (culturally, racially/ethnically, and level of education) across 14 states. Nutrition education programs targeting similar behaviors with English speaking clients could consider this dietary behavior questionnaire.
开发和建立扩展食品和营养教育计划(EFNEP)的饮食行为评估问题的可靠性和有效性。
使用认知访谈、专家小组、测试/重测可靠性和预测试/后测试的混合方法研究。
美国 14 个州。
认知访谈的便利样本为低收入 EFNEP 或 EFNEP 合格参与者(n=111)、可靠性测试(n=181)和对变化的敏感性测试(n=382)。
表面效度和内容效度、时间可靠性和对变化的敏感性的指标。
在认知访谈中解释为预期的问题,可靠性测试的组内相关系数和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数;对变化的敏感性的配对 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验;以及识别可能的量表的探索性因素分析。
认知访谈导致 3 轮问题修订;可靠性值范围为组内相关系数的 0.48-0.77 和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数的 0.43-0.77。对于对变化的敏感性,9 项在预测试和后测试之间有变化的证据(P<0.05),而 5 项在去除变化余地较小的项目后有变化的证据。确定了两个量表:饮食质量和非奶酪乳制品。
EFNEP 的新饮食行为评估问题在 14 个州的不同收入、多样化的人群(文化、种族/族裔和教育程度)中表现出了表面和内容效度、中等至高强度的可靠性以及检测自我报告行为变化的敏感性。针对具有英语客户的类似行为的营养教育计划可以考虑使用这种饮食行为问卷。