Suppr超能文献

无法切除的胰腺腺癌患者的强化全身治疗和立体定向消融放疗剂量。

Intensified systemic therapy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy dose for patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, USA.

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2020 Nov;152:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to report the long-term impact of modern chemotherapy and SABR dose regimens on oncologic outcomes of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the treatment characteristics and outcomes of all patients who received multi-fraction SABR for unresectable PA between February 2007 and August 2018 at our institution. Time-to-events were calculated from date of diagnosis treating death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 15 months (range: 5-47). Median SABR dose was 33 Gy (range: 20-45) delivered in 5 fractions in 143 patients, and 3 or 6 fractions in 6 patients. 107 patients (72%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy while 31 (21%) received modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX). Median OS was 16 months (95% CI, 14-17), with a 1-year cumulative incidence of LF of 14%. The combination of SABR doses ≥40 Gy and mFFX (n = 21) showed a superior PFS and OS to the use of GEM-based chemotherapy with <40 Gy SABR doses (median PFS: 14 vs. 10 months, HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.71, P = 0.003; median OS: 24 vs. 14 months, HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59, P = 0.002), with 1-year PFS and OS of 67% and 90% compared to 35% and 59% for those who received GEM-based chemotherapy with <40 Gy SABR doses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mFFX and a SABR dose ≥40 Gy in 5 fractions may be superior compared to regimens that utilize gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or SABR doses <40 Gy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告现代化疗和立体定向消融放疗(SABR)剂量方案对不可切除胰腺腺癌(PA)患者肿瘤学结局的长期影响。

材料和方法

我们回顾了 2007 年 2 月至 2018 年 8 月期间在我院接受多分割 SABR 治疗不可切除 PA 的所有患者的治疗特征和结局。从诊断日期开始计算时间事件,将死亡视为竞争风险。

结果

共纳入 149 例患者。中位随访时间为 15 个月(范围:5-47)。中位 SABR 剂量为 33 Gy(范围:20-45),在 143 例患者中采用 5 次分割,在 6 例患者中采用 3 次或 6 次分割。107 例(72%)患者接受吉西他滨为基础的化疗,31 例(21%)患者接受改良 FOLFIRINOX(mFFX)化疗。中位 OS 为 16 个月(95%CI,14-17),1 年累积 LF 发生率为 14%。SABR 剂量≥40 Gy 联合 mFFX(n=21)的 PFS 和 OS 优于 SABR 剂量<40 Gy 联合吉西他滨为基础化疗(中位 PFS:14 与 10 个月,HR:0.46,95%CI:0.29-0.71,P=0.003;中位 OS:24 与 14 个月,HR:0.36,95%CI:0.22-0.59,P=0.002),1 年 PFS 和 OS 率分别为 67%和 90%,而接受 SABR 剂量<40 Gy 联合吉西他滨为基础化疗的患者分别为 35%和 59%。

结论

与吉西他滨为基础化疗或 SABR 剂量<40 Gy 的方案相比,使用 mFFX 和 5 次分割 SABR 剂量≥40 Gy 的方案可能更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验