Ghussen F, Krüger I, Groth W, Stützer H
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, West Germany.
Cancer. 1988 Feb 15;61(4):654-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880215)61:4<654::aid-cncr2820610406>3.0.co;2-v.
To evaluate the effectiveness of regional hyperthermic cytostatic perfusion in patients with malignant melanomas of the extremities, 107 patients were included in a prospective randomized study. In a control group (A, n = 54) the tumors were widely excised, and the regional lymph nodes were dissected. The patients in the perfusion group (B, n = 53) received additional hyperthermic (42 degrees C) perfusion with melphalan. The disease-free survival time was chosen as the criterion for success. An intermediate evaluation (average follow-up observation period of 550 days) revealed a highly significant difference between the groups (P = 0.0001): 21 recurrences in the control group versus four recurrences in the perfusion group. In a second analysis 3 1/2 years after premature discontinuation, 26 recurrences were diagnosed in Group A, whereas only six recurrences were noted in Group B (P = 0.0001). A retrospective analysis of the entire test group revealed the following figures. In Group A seven recurrences in Stage I were diagnosed, seven in Stage II, and 12 in Stage III. In Group B one was observed in Stage I, one in Stage II, and four in Stage III. The level of significance was calculated to be P = 0.05 in Stage I, P = 0.05 in Stage II, and P = 0.01 in Stage III. The results of the study show that additional perfusion in the treatment of extremity melanomas is superior to conventional methods.
为评估区域热疗性细胞抑制灌注对肢体恶性黑色素瘤患者的疗效,107例患者被纳入一项前瞻性随机研究。在对照组(A组,n = 54)中,肿瘤被广泛切除,并清扫区域淋巴结。灌注组(B组,n = 53)的患者接受了美法仑的额外热疗(42℃)灌注。无病生存时间被选为成功的标准。中期评估(平均随访观察期550天)显示两组之间存在高度显著差异(P = 0.0001):对照组有21例复发,而灌注组有4例复发。在提前终止3年半后的第二次分析中,A组诊断出26例复发,而B组仅记录到6例复发(P = 0.0001)。对整个试验组的回顾性分析得出以下数据。A组中,I期诊断出7例复发,II期7例,III期12例。B组中,I期观察到1例,II期1例,III期4例。计算得出的显著性水平为:I期P = 0.05,II期P = 0.05,III期P = 0.01。研究结果表明,在肢体黑色素瘤的治疗中,额外的灌注优于传统方法。