Department of Psychology, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Bellingham, WA, 98225, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec;27(6):1309-1316. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01782-z.
We investigated the category bias in spatial memory, which reveals the influence of a region (i.e., a spatial category) on memory for specific locations within the region's bounds. The standard approach to investigating the category bias employs a static dot-in-circle task, in which observers indicate the location of a single dot from memory after a brief interval. The agreement in the literature is that these location estimates result from Bayesian principles; however, the priors in the dot-in-circle task are geometric prototypes (the central angular value of each quadrant and two-thirds of the radius from the center of the circle to its circumference). These geometric prototypes are not "true" priors in that they are not pre-existing statistical likelihoods of a target's location before other evidence is considered. In this paper, we tested the category bias with items for which informative priors exist (e.g., a vase, which is expected to be in the center of a table) and found that people favor them over geometric prototypes for estimating angular but not radial target positions. Our work contributes to the literature by showing that localizing common everyday objects in a circular space is not restricted to the use of cues intrinsic to the space. This is important because the majority of the empirical data on the category bias derives from locating targets that have little to no semantic information.
我们研究了空间记忆中的类别偏差,该偏差揭示了区域(即空间类别)对区域边界内特定位置记忆的影响。研究类别偏差的标准方法采用静态点在圆任务,观察者在短暂间隔后从记忆中指示单个点的位置。文献中的共识是,这些位置估计来自贝叶斯原理;然而,点在圆任务中的先验是几何原型(每个象限的中心角度值以及从圆的中心到其圆周的半径的三分之二)。这些几何原型不是“真实”的先验,因为它们不是在考虑其他证据之前目标位置的预先存在的统计可能性。在本文中,我们用存在信息先验的项目(例如花瓶,预计在桌子的中心)测试了类别偏差,发现人们在估计角度目标位置时更喜欢它们而不是几何原型,但在估计径向目标位置时则不然。我们的工作通过表明在圆形空间中定位常见的日常物体不仅限于使用空间固有的线索,为文献做出了贡献。这很重要,因为关于类别偏差的大多数经验数据都来自于定位几乎没有语义信息的目标。