• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在英国滥用非洲人DNA的指控:南非的数据保护立法足以防止此类事件再次发生吗?

Allegations of misuse of African DNA in the UK: Will data protection legislation in South Africa be sufficient to prevent a recurrence?

作者信息

Moodley Keymanthri, Kleinsmidt Anita

出版信息

Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Sep;21(3):125-130. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12277. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1111/dewb.12277
PMID:32767549
Abstract

Concerns have been raised around the alleged commercialisation of South African genetic material by various research institutes nationally and abroad. We consider whether the Protection of Personal Information Act in South Africa will conflict with or complement existing protections in health law and research ethics. The Act is not applicable to de-identified samples that cannot be re-identified but we question whether genetic samples can ever be truly de-identified. The research participants in this matter provided consent for use of their samples for research but did not consent to commercialisation by global research institutions, and neither did the researchers. We suggest that consent models incorporating broad consent as an option should include explicit discussions around benefit sharing and commercialisation. Mistrust between researchers and participants impedes scientific research and can harm relationships built up over the years between South African researchers and local communities.

摘要

国内外各研究机构对南非遗传物质的所谓商业化问题表示了担忧。我们探讨南非的《个人信息保护法》是否会与卫生法和研究伦理中的现有保护措施产生冲突或互补。该法案不适用于无法重新识别身份的匿名样本,但我们质疑基因样本是否真的能做到完全匿名。此事中的研究参与者同意将其样本用于研究,但不同意全球研究机构将其商业化,研究人员也不同意。我们建议,将广泛同意作为一种选项的同意模式应包括围绕利益分享和商业化的明确讨论。研究人员与参与者之间的不信任阻碍了科学研究,可能会损害南非研究人员与当地社区多年来建立的关系。

相似文献

1
Allegations of misuse of African DNA in the UK: Will data protection legislation in South Africa be sufficient to prevent a recurrence?关于在英国滥用非洲人DNA的指控:南非的数据保护立法足以防止此类事件再次发生吗?
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Sep;21(3):125-130. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12277. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.
3
Safeguarding the future of genomic research in South Africa: Broad consent and the Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013.保障南非基因组研究的未来:广泛同意和 2013 年第 4 号个人信息保护法案。
S Afr Med J. 2019 Jun 28;109(7):468-470. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i7.14148.
4
"It's my blood": ethical complexities in the use, storage and export of biological samples: perspectives from South African research participants.“这是我的血液”:生物样本使用、储存及出口中的伦理复杂性:南非研究参与者的观点
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jan 22;15:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-4.
5
Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities.网络研讨会报告:利益相关者对商业实体使用基因组数据的知情同意的观点。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 14;50(1):57-61. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108650.
6
Broad consent for biobank research in South Africa - Towards an enabling ethico-legal framework.南非生物样本库研究的广泛同意——迈向有利的伦理法律框架。
Glob Bioeth. 2023 Dec 20;35(1):2288331. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2023.2288331. eCollection 2024.
7
Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.南非研究伦理委员会对生物医学研究的监督:对非快速审查方案伦理审查期间提出的伦理问题的主题分析。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Apr;14(2):107-116. doi: 10.1177/1556264618824921. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
How well does South Africa's National Health Act regulate research involving children?南非的《国家卫生法案》对涉及儿童的研究监管得如何?
S Afr Med J. 2005 Apr;95(4):265-8.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
10
Streamlining regulatory processes for health researchers: To what extent does POPIA apply?简化卫生研究人员的监管流程:POPIA 在多大程度上适用?
S Afr Med J. 2023 Aug 3;113(8):30-33. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i8.781.

引用本文的文献

1
Science and Society: Pathways to Equitable Access and Delivery of Genomics Medicine in Africa.科学与社会:非洲实现基因组医学公平获取与提供的途径
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2025;13(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s40142-024-00211-0. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Data as scientific currency: Challenges experienced by researchers with sharing health data in sub-Saharan Africa.作为科学货币的数据:撒哈拉以南非洲地区研究人员在共享健康数据时遇到的挑战。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 24;3(10):e0000635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000635. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Trust as moral currency: Perspectives of health researchers in sub-Saharan Africa on strategies to promote equitable data sharing.
信任作为道德货币:撒哈拉以南非洲地区健康研究人员对促进公平数据共享策略的看法。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Sep 27;3(9):e0000551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000551. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Beyond the Human Genome Project: The Age of Complete Human Genome Sequences and Pangenome References.超越人类基因组计划:完整人类基因组序列和泛基因组参考时代。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2024 Aug;25(1):77-104. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-021623-081639. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
5
Artificial intelligence (AI) or augmented intelligence? How big data and AI are transforming healthcare: Challenges and opportunities.人工智能(AI)还是增强智能?大数据和人工智能如何改变医疗保健:挑战与机遇。
S Afr Med J. 2023 Dec 31;114(1):22-26. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i1.1631.
6
Broad consent for biobank research in South Africa - Towards an enabling ethico-legal framework.南非生物样本库研究的广泛同意——迈向有利的伦理法律框架。
Glob Bioeth. 2023 Dec 20;35(1):2288331. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2023.2288331. eCollection 2024.
7
Genetic and Genomic Researchers' Perspectives on Biological Sample Sharing in Collaborative Research in Uganda: A Qualitative Study.遗传和基因组研究人员对乌干达合作研究中生物样本共享的看法:一项定性研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):134-146. doi: 10.1177/15562646231171289. Epub 2023 May 7.
8
A blank check or a global public good? A qualitative study of how ethics review committee members in Colombia weigh the risks and benefits of broad consent for data and sample sharing during a pandemic.一张空白支票还是一项全球公共利益?关于哥伦比亚伦理审查委员会成员如何权衡大流行期间数据和样本共享广泛同意的风险与益处的定性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 6;2(6):e0000364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000364. eCollection 2022.
9
Benefit sharing in genomic and biobanking research in Uganda: Perceptions of researchers and research ethics committee members.乌干达基因组和生物样本库研究中的利益分享:研究人员和研究伦理委员会成员的看法。
Front Genet. 2022 Nov 17;13:1037401. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1037401. eCollection 2022.
10
Rethinking benefit sharing in collaborative human genetic research from an Afrocommunitarian perspective.从非洲社群主义视角重新思考人类基因合作研究中的利益共享
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 12;13:1014120. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1014120. eCollection 2022.