Bos Elke M E, Posner Karen L, Domino Karen B, de Quelerij Marcel, Kalkman Cor J, Hollmann Markus W, Lirk Philipp
From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (EMEB, MWH), Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (KLP, KBD), Department of Anaesthesiology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (MdQ), Division of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands (CJK) and Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (PL).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Sep;37(9):743-751. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001260.
Severe complications after neuraxial anaesthesia are rare but potentially devastating.
We aimed to identify characteristics and preventable causes of haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia.
Observational study, closed claims analysis.
Closed anaesthesia malpractice claims from the USA and the Netherlands were examined from 2007 until 2017.
Claims of patients with haematoma (n = 41), abscess (n = 18) or meningitis (n = 14) associated with neuraxial anaesthesia for labour, acute and chronic pain that initiated and closed between 2007 and 2017 were included. There were no exclusions.
We analysed potential preventable causes in patient-related, neuraxial procedure-related, treatment-related and legal characteristics of these complications.
Patients experiencing spinal haematoma were predominantly above 60 years of age and using antihaemostatic medication, whereas patients with abscess or meningitis were middle-aged, relatively healthy and more often involved in emergency interventions. Potential preventable causes of unfavourable sequelae constituted errors in timing/prescription of antihaemostatic medication (10 claims, 14%), unsterile procedures (n = 10, 14%) and delay in diagnosis/treatment of the complication (n = 18, 25%). The number of claims resulting in payment was similar between countries (USA n = 15, 38% vs. the Netherlands n = 17, 52%; P = 0.25). The median indemnity payment, which the patient received varied widely between the USA (&OV0556;285 488, n = 14) and the Netherlands (&OV0556;31 031, n = 17) (P = 0.004). However, the considerable differences in legal systems and administration of expenses between countries may make meaningful comparison of indemnity payments inappropriate.
Claims of spinal haematoma were often related to errors in antihaemostatic medication and delay in diagnosis and/or treatment. Spinal abscess claims were related to emergency interventions and lack of sterility. We wish to highlight these potential preventable causes, both when performing the neuraxial procedure and during postprocedural care of patients.
神经轴索麻醉后的严重并发症罕见但可能具有毁灭性。
我们旨在确定神经轴索麻醉后血肿、脓肿或脑膜炎的特征及可预防原因。
观察性研究,闭合性索赔分析。
对2007年至2017年美国和荷兰的麻醉医疗事故闭合性索赔进行了审查。
纳入了2007年至2017年期间与神经轴索麻醉相关的分娩、急慢性疼痛的血肿(n = 41)、脓肿(n = 18)或脑膜炎(n = 14)患者的索赔案例,无排除标准。
我们分析了这些并发症在患者相关、神经轴索操作相关、治疗相关及法律特征方面的潜在可预防原因。
发生脊髓血肿的患者主要为60岁以上且正在使用抗止血药物,而脓肿或脑膜炎患者为中年,相对健康,且更多地参与紧急干预。不良后果的潜在可预防原因包括抗止血药物的时间/处方错误(10例索赔,14%)、操作不无菌(n = 10,14%)以及并发症诊断/治疗延迟(n = 18,25%)。各国导致赔付的索赔数量相似(美国n = 15,38%;荷兰n = 17,52%;P = 0.25)。患者获得的赔付中位数在美国(285488英镑,n = 14)和荷兰(31031英镑,n = 17)之间差异很大(P = 0.004)。然而,各国法律体系和费用管理的显著差异可能使赔付的有意义比较不合适。
脊髓血肿索赔通常与抗止血药物错误及诊断和/或治疗延迟有关。脊髓脓肿索赔与紧急干预和缺乏无菌操作有关。我们希望在进行神经轴索操作及患者术后护理时强调这些潜在的可预防原因。